Utility of the Shock Index as a Prognostic Predictor in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery for Trauma: A Single Center, Retrospective Study

<b>Background:</b> Shock index (SI) is calculated by dividing heart rate (HR) by systolic blood pressure (sBP) and is a useful tool for predicting the prognosis of trauma patients. This study aimed to determine whether SI is useful in predicting mortality in patients undergoing emergency surgery for trauma. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed 1657 patients who underwent emergency surgery for trauma. Patients were divided into SI < 1 and SI ≥ 1 groups and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS), transfusion amount, and mortality were compared. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mortality. <b>Results</b>: There were significant differences in GCS, ISS, RTS, and KTAS in the SI ≥ 1 group compared to the SI < 1 group (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.001). In the SI < 1 cohort, the mortality rate was 11% (144/1283), and in the SI ≥ 1 group the mortality rate was 33% (125/374) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Age, GCS, ISS, SI ≥ 1, and KTAS were determined to be predictors of mortality by logistic regression analysis. In particular, SI ≥ 1 group members exhibited a high association with elevated mortality (OR, 2.498; 95% CI, 1.708-3.652; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: Although SI alone has limitations in predicting the patient's prognosis, patients with SI ≥ 1 upon arrival at the emergency room are associated with mortality of patients undergoing emergency surgery for trauma, along with already known trauma assessment systems such as GCS, ISS, and KTAS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196783
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of the Shock Index as a Prognostic Predictor in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery for Trauma: A Single Center, Retrospective Study

Byungchul Yu, Kunhee Lee, Youn Yi Jo, Chun‐Gon Park
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Utility of the Shock Index as a Prognostic Predictor in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery for Trauma: A Single Center, Retrospective Study

Byungchul Yu, Kunhee Lee, Youn Yi Jo, Chun‐Gon Park
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Shock index (SI) is calculated by dividing heart rate (HR) by systolic blood pressure (sBP) and is a useful tool for predicting the prognosis of trauma patients. This study aimed to determine whether SI is useful in predicting mortality in patients undergoing emergency surgery for trauma. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed 1657 patients who underwent emergency surgery for trauma. Patients were divided into SI < 1 and SI ≥ 1 groups and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS), transfusion amount, and mortality were compared. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mortality. <b>Results</b>: There were significant differences in GCS, ISS, RTS, and KTAS in the SI ≥ 1 group compared to the SI < 1 group (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.001). In the SI < 1 cohort, the mortality rate was 11% (144/1283), and in the SI ≥ 1 group the mortality rate was 33% (125/374) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Age, GCS, ISS, SI ≥ 1, and KTAS were determined to be predictors of mortality by logistic regression analysis. In particular, SI ≥ 1 group members exhibited a high association with elevated mortality (OR, 2.498; 95% CI, 1.708-3.652; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: Although SI alone has limitations in predicting the patient's prognosis, patients with SI ≥ 1 upon arrival at the emergency room are associated with mortality of patients undergoing emergency surgery for trauma, along with already known trauma assessment systems such as GCS, ISS, and KTAS.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
Gachon University Gil Medical Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.