Outcome of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Harbouring IDH1 or FGFR2 Alterations: A Retrospective Observational Real-World Study from a French Cohort

<b>Background</b>: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) management has undergone tremendous changes, benefiting from the identification of highly actionable molecular alterations. Among these, <i>IDH1</i> mutations and <i>FGFR2</i> fusions are the most common alterations detected and are classified as ESCAT tier 1 in BTC. However, their prognostic value in real-world settings remains uncertain. <b>Objective</b>: To explore overall survival (OS) in patients harbouring locally advanced or metastatic BTC (mBTC) with <i>IDH1</i> or <i>FGFR2</i> alterations, compared to those with wild-type tumours. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective, multicentre study included patients with mBTC treated between 2020 and 2023 across five French centres. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on molecular profiling: those with <i>IDH1</i> or <i>FGFR2</i> alterations, and those with wild-type tumours (WT-mBTC). <b>Results</b>: 119 consecutive patients were included. 18 were classified as altered (<i>IDH1</i> = 13; <i>FGFR2</i> = 5). Sixty-four pts underwent no molecular testing. The median OS of the entire cohort was 11.9 months (10.3-14.3). The median OS was 24.2 months (12.3-NA) versus 10.8 months (7.9-12.9), <i>p</i> = 0.02, in the altered and WT-mBTC cohorts, respectively. The Cox regression model conducted depicted an HR for death of 0.46 (CI95%, 0.2-0.9) for <i>IDH1</i> or <i>FGFR2</i> alterations. There were no diffence in PFS for first-line. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our cohort suggests that IDH1 or FGFR2 alterations may be associated with prognostic differences in patients with metastatic BTC, although they do not appear to influence outcomes under first-line treatment. These findings are consistent with trends observed in clinical trials. Whether improved survival is solely attributable to targeted therapies remains questionable. In line with ESMO recommendations, systematic molecular profiling should be considered in patients with mBTC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196759
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Harbouring IDH1 or FGFR2 Alterations: A Retrospective Observational Real-World Study from a French Cohort

Fabien Moinard‐Butot, Méher Ben Abdelghani, C. Bigot, Mathieu Cotton et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Outcome of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Harbouring IDH1 or FGFR2 Alterations: A Retrospective Observational Real-World Study from a French Cohort

Fabien Moinard‐Butot, Méher Ben Abdelghani, C. Bigot, Mathieu Cotton, Pascale Chiappa, Dan Karouby, Christine Belletier, Erwan Pencreach, Lauriane Eberst, Jean-Baptiste Barbe-Richaud, Pierre Rivière, J.E. Kurtz
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) management has undergone tremendous changes, benefiting from the identification of highly actionable molecular alterations. Among these, <i>IDH1</i> mutations and <i>FGFR2</i> fusions are the most common alterations detected and are classified as ESCAT tier 1 in BTC. However, their prognostic value in real-world settings remains uncertain. <b>Objective</b>: To explore overall survival (OS) in patients harbouring locally advanced or metastatic BTC (mBTC) with <i>IDH1</i> or <i>FGFR2</i> alterations, compared to those with wild-type tumours. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective, multicentre study included patients with mBTC treated between 2020 and 2023 across five French centres. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on molecular profiling: those with <i>IDH1</i> or <i>FGFR2</i> alterations, and those with wild-type tumours (WT-mBTC). <b>Results</b>: 119 consecutive patients were included. 18 were classified as altered (<i>IDH1</i> = 13; <i>FGFR2</i> = 5). Sixty-four pts underwent no molecular testing. The median OS of the entire cohort was 11.9 months (10.3-14.3). The median OS was 24.2 months (12.3-NA) versus 10.8 months (7.9-12.9), <i>p</i> = 0.02, in the altered and WT-mBTC cohorts, respectively. The Cox regression model conducted depicted an HR for death of 0.46 (CI95%, 0.2-0.9) for <i>IDH1</i> or <i>FGFR2</i> alterations. There were no diffence in PFS for first-line. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our cohort suggests that IDH1 or FGFR2 alterations may be associated with prognostic differences in patients with metastatic BTC, although they do not appear to influence outcomes under first-line treatment. These findings are consistent with trends observed in clinical trials. Whether improved survival is solely attributable to targeted therapies remains questionable. In line with ESMO recommendations, systematic molecular profiling should be considered in patients with mBTC.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.