Dual-Attention-Based Block Matching for Dynamic Point Cloud Compression
The irregular and highly non-uniform spatial distribution inherent to dynamic three-dimensional (3D) point clouds (DPCs) severely hampers the extraction of reliable temporal context, rendering inter-frame compression a formidable challenge. Inspired by two-dimensional (2D) image and video compression methods, existing approaches attempt to model the temporal dependence of DPCs through a motion estimation/motion compensation (ME/MC) framework. However, these approaches represent only preliminary applications of this framework; point consistency between adjacent frames is insufficiently explored, and temporal correlation requires further investigation. To address this limitation, we propose a hierarchical ME/MC framework that adaptively selects the granularity of the estimated motion field, thereby ensuring a fine-grained inter-frame prediction process. To further enhance motion estimation accuracy, we introduce a dual-attention-based KNN block-matching (DA-KBM) network. This network employs a bidirectional attention mechanism to more precisely measure the correlation between points, using closely correlated points to predict inter-frame motion vectors and thereby improve inter-frame prediction accuracy. Experimental results show that the proposed DPC compression method achieves a significant improvement (gain of 70%) in the BD-Rate metric on the 8iFVBv2 dataset. compared with the standardized Video-based Point Cloud Compression (V-PCC) v13 method, and a 16% gain over the state-of-the-art deep learning-based inter-mode method.
Authors
- Longhua Sun
- Yingrui Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5532-3454)
- Qing Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0918-3996)
Institutions
- Beijing University of Technology (CN)
- Qilu Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Imaging
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11100332
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.33