A comparative study of TEEP and IELTS for transnational education (TNE) students and their relationship to subject study

This paper reports on a comparative study of two English language tests in a transnational education (TNE) context: TEEP (Test of English for Educational Purposes) developed at the University of Reading (U.K.) and IELTS (International English Language Testing System). Our study adopted a longitudinal mixed-methods design. Students’ TEEP and IELTS results were collected, and then two phases of focus groups with students were conducted to explore their perceptions of test-taking and academic study. Quantitative data were subject to statistical analysis and qualitative data to thematic analysis. Quantitative results showed that the students performed significantly better on Speaking and Writing in TEEP while they performed significantly better overall and on Listening and Reading in IELTS. Factor Analysis suggested both TEEP and IELTS tapped into one single underlying construct which we termed English-language proficiency. Qualitative results from focus groups illuminated the quantitative findings and the perceived relevance in their subject study. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of English for Academic Purposes Research and Practice
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/ijeap.2025.11
Citations
1
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of TEEP and IELTS for transnational education (TNE) students and their relationship to subject study

Elisabeth Wilding, Ting Ouyang, Daguo Li, John Slaght
1 citations
International Journal of English for Academic Purposes Research and Practice
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
10.42
article

A comparative study of TEEP and IELTS for transnational education (TNE) students and their relationship to subject study

Elisabeth Wilding, Ting Ouyang, Daguo Li, John Slaght
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper reports on a comparative study of two English language tests in a transnational education (TNE) context: TEEP (Test of English for Educational Purposes) developed at the University of Reading (U.K.) and IELTS (International English Language Testing System). Our study adopted a longitudinal mixed-methods design. Students’ TEEP and IELTS results were collected, and then two phases of focus groups with students were conducted to explore their perceptions of test-taking and academic study. Quantitative data were subject to statistical analysis and qualitative data to thematic analysis. Quantitative results showed that the students performed significantly better on Speaking and Writing in TEEP while they performed significantly better overall and on Listening and Reading in IELTS. Factor Analysis suggested both TEEP and IELTS tapped into one single underlying construct which we termed English-language proficiency. Qualitative results from focus groups illuminated the quantitative findings and the perceived relevance in their subject study. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

International Journal of English for Academic Purposes Research and PracticeVol. 5(2)
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Schlumberger (Ireland) (IE), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.