Comparison of the performance between three Doppler wind lidars and a novel wind speed correction algorithm

Abstract. Doppler wind Lidars (DWLs) have been widely used to detect wind vector variations, based on ground monitoring of atmospheric boundary layer and wind shear. This study evaluates the performance between three DWLs and in situ balloon radiosonde. Lidars data comparison focuses on low altitudes (height <2 km) from July to September 2021 from three producers: MSD (Minshida), CUIT (homemade), and WP (windprofile) Lidars. Within the research height range, comparisons show the root mean square errors (RMSE) for wind speed were 1.11, 4.45, and 5.15 m s−1, while wind direction RMSE were shown at 49.83, 82.89, and 84.87°, respectively. The measurement accuracy decreases with the altitude increase (up to 2 km). The Lidar performance requires a certain amount of aerosol backscattering, when PM2.5 ranges within 35–50 µg m−3, MSD Lidar exhibited the highest wind speed correlation (R2=0.82) with radiosonde, and the wind direction accuracy observed with the three Lidars is enhanced with the increase of aerosol concentration, indicating that particle loading is the critical factor affecting the wind profile. Lidar performance varied significantly with planetary boundary layer heights (PBLH), particularly, the Lidar performance is relatively optimal when the PBLH within 500–750 m, with the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) of wind speed are 0.97, 0.92, and 0.72, while the wind direction is shown at 0.98, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively. The vertical relationship between cloud base height (CBH) and PBLH had also varied influences on the Lidar measurements. Machine learning was used to remove anomalies and complement missing values, the random forest (RF) demonstrated superior performance, with the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.93(CUIT) and 0.90(WP) in the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. RF-based correction of CUIT data enhanced the R2 from 0.42 to 0.65. The R2 between the RF-based CUIT and Aeolus satellite data was 0.83, indicating that the method effectively improved data, even in circumstances of anomalies. We proposed a new correction algorithm combined with the isolation forest (IF) and RF to handle high-dimensional and incomplete datasets. Our procedure could increase the Lidar measurement quality of wind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4755-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the performance between three Doppler wind lidars and a novel wind speed correction algorithm

Yuan Li, Fugui Zhang, Hancheng Hu, Hao Wu et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
article

Comparison of the performance between three Doppler wind lidars and a novel wind speed correction algorithm

Yuan Li, Fugui Zhang, Hancheng Hu, Hao Wu, Mengqi Liu, Yidan Zhang, Haicheng She
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Doppler wind Lidars (DWLs) have been widely used to detect wind vector variations, based on ground monitoring of atmospheric boundary layer and wind shear. This study evaluates the performance between three DWLs and in situ balloon radiosonde. Lidars data comparison focuses on low altitudes (height <2 km) from July to September 2021 from three producers: MSD (Minshida), CUIT (homemade), and WP (windprofile) Lidars. Within the research height range, comparisons show the root mean square errors (RMSE) for wind speed were 1.11, 4.45, and 5.15 m s−1, while wind direction RMSE were shown at 49.83, 82.89, and 84.87°, respectively. The measurement accuracy decreases with the altitude increase (up to 2 km). The Lidar performance requires a certain amount of aerosol backscattering, when PM2.5 ranges within 35–50 µg m−3, MSD Lidar exhibited the highest wind speed correlation (R2=0.82) with radiosonde, and the wind direction accuracy observed with the three Lidars is enhanced with the increase of aerosol concentration, indicating that particle loading is the critical factor affecting the wind profile. Lidar performance varied significantly with planetary boundary layer heights (PBLH), particularly, the Lidar performance is relatively optimal when the PBLH within 500–750 m, with the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) of wind speed are 0.97, 0.92, and 0.72, while the wind direction is shown at 0.98, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively. The vertical relationship between cloud base height (CBH) and PBLH had also varied influences on the Lidar measurements. Machine learning was used to remove anomalies and complement missing values, the random forest (RF) demonstrated superior performance, with the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.93(CUIT) and 0.90(WP) in the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. RF-based correction of CUIT data enhanced the R2 from 0.42 to 0.65. The R2 between the RF-based CUIT and Aeolus satellite data was 0.83, indicating that the method effectively improved data, even in circumstances of anomalies. We proposed a new correction algorithm combined with the isolation forest (IF) and RF to handle high-dimensional and incomplete datasets. Our procedure could increase the Lidar measurement quality of wind.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(18)
Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN)
Chengdu University of Information Technology, National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Meteorological Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.