Novelty as a drive of human exploration in complex stochastic environments

In order to find extrinsic rewards, humans explore their environment even if exploration requires several intermediate, reward-free decisions. It has been hypothesized that intrinsic rewards, such as novelty, surprise, or information gain, guide this reward-free exploration. However, in artificial agents, different intrinsic reward signals induce exploration strategies that respond differently to stochasticity. In particular, some strategies are vulnerable to the "noisy TV problem," i.e., an attraction to irrelevant stochastic stimuli. Here, we ask whether humans exhibit a similar attraction to reward-free stochasticity. We design a multistep decision-making paradigm in which participants search for rewarding states in a complex environment containing a highly stochastic but reward-free subregion. We show that i) participants persistently explore the stochastic subregion, and ii) their decisions are best explained by a novelty-driven exploration strategy, compared to alternatives driven by information gain or surprise. Our findings suggest that novelty and extrinsic rewards jointly control human exploration in complex environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2502193122
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novelty as a drive of human exploration in complex stochastic environments

Wei‐Hsiang Lin, Wulfram Gerstner, Michael H. Herzog, Xu He et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Child and Animal Learning Development
6.89
article

Novelty as a drive of human exploration in complex stochastic environments

Wei‐Hsiang Lin, Wulfram Gerstner, Michael H. Herzog, Xu He, Alireza Modirshanechi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In order to find extrinsic rewards, humans explore their environment even if exploration requires several intermediate, reward-free decisions. It has been hypothesized that intrinsic rewards, such as novelty, surprise, or information gain, guide this reward-free exploration. However, in artificial agents, different intrinsic reward signals induce exploration strategies that respond differently to stochasticity. In particular, some strategies are vulnerable to the "noisy TV problem," i.e., an attraction to irrelevant stochastic stimuli. Here, we ask whether humans exhibit a similar attraction to reward-free stochasticity. We design a multistep decision-making paradigm in which participants search for rewarding states in a complex environment containing a highly stochastic but reward-free subregion. We show that i) participants persistently explore the stochastic subregion, and ii) their decisions are best explained by a novelty-driven exploration strategy, compared to alternatives driven by information gain or surprise. Our findings suggest that novelty and extrinsic rewards jointly control human exploration in complex environments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(39)
Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), MIND Research Institute (US), Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Child and Animal Learning Development
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Novelty as a drive of human exploration in complex stochastic environments — Wei‐Hsiang Lin, Wulfram Gerstner, et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS