Automating Algorithm Experiments With ALGator: From Problem Modeling to Reproducible Results

ABSTRACT Background Theoretical algorithm analysis provides fundamental insights into algorithm complexity but relies on simplified and often outdated computational models. Experimental algorithmics complements this approach by evaluating the empirical performance of algorithm implementations on real data and modern computing platforms. However, the absence of standardized, reproducible experimental environments limits the reliability and comparability of results. Objective This work aims to establish a formal and reproducible framework for algorithm experimentation and to provide a practical platform that enables researchers to model problems, execute experiments, and share results transparently. Methods We propose a comprehensive experimentation model that formalizes all key entities of algorithm evaluation, including inputs, outputs, test cases, test sets, parameters, algorithms, and performance indicators. The model is implemented in ALGator, an open‐source system that automates test case generation, algorithm execution, output validation, and result presentation, while supporting collaborative development and public dissemination of experiments. Results The capabilities of ALGator are demonstrated through a case study on the array‐sorting problem. Experiments comparing Hoare's and Yaroslavskiy's Quicksort implementations reveal nuanced performance differences: Hoare's version excels on random inputs without duplicates, whereas Yaroslavskiy's performs substantially better when input data contain many duplicates. All experimental data and configurations are openly available through the ALGator platform. Conclusion The combination of a formal experimental model and its open‐source implementation in ALGator provides a robust foundation for reproducible experimental algorithmics. This approach promotes transparency, facilitates independent verification, and enables researchers to extend existing experiments with new test cases and performance metrics, advancing the reproducibility and reliability of empirical algorithm evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Software Practice and Experience
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.70020
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating Algorithm Experiments With ALGator: From Problem Modeling to Reproducible Results

Tomaž Dobravec
Software Practice and Experience
Machine Learning and Algorithms
article

Automating Algorithm Experiments With ALGator: From Problem Modeling to Reproducible Results

Tomaž Dobravec
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Theoretical algorithm analysis provides fundamental insights into algorithm complexity but relies on simplified and often outdated computational models. Experimental algorithmics complements this approach by evaluating the empirical performance of algorithm implementations on real data and modern computing platforms. However, the absence of standardized, reproducible experimental environments limits the reliability and comparability of results. Objective This work aims to establish a formal and reproducible framework for algorithm experimentation and to provide a practical platform that enables researchers to model problems, execute experiments, and share results transparently. Methods We propose a comprehensive experimentation model that formalizes all key entities of algorithm evaluation, including inputs, outputs, test cases, test sets, parameters, algorithms, and performance indicators. The model is implemented in ALGator, an open‐source system that automates test case generation, algorithm execution, output validation, and result presentation, while supporting collaborative development and public dissemination of experiments. Results The capabilities of ALGator are demonstrated through a case study on the array‐sorting problem. Experiments comparing Hoare's and Yaroslavskiy's Quicksort implementations reveal nuanced performance differences: Hoare's version excels on random inputs without duplicates, whereas Yaroslavskiy's performs substantially better when input data contain many duplicates. All experimental data and configurations are openly available through the ALGator platform. Conclusion The combination of a formal experimental model and its open‐source implementation in ALGator provides a robust foundation for reproducible experimental algorithmics. This approach promotes transparency, facilitates independent verification, and enables researchers to extend existing experiments with new test cases and performance metrics, advancing the reproducibility and reliability of empirical algorithm evaluation.

Software Practice and ExperienceVol. 56(1)
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Machine Learning and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.