An update on the serum and urinary biomarkers in diagnosing prostate cancer

Introduction: In terms of global health issues, prostate cancer ranks high. The prostate cancer diagnosis rate is on the rise in India, where it ranks as the second most frequent malignancy among men. Most of the prostate cancers are not life threatening, but one fifth of them end up with unfavorable outcome [1]. Transrectal prostate biopsy (PBx) is used to diagnose prostate cancer widely nowadays. The results of the digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or increased blood prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels are used to determine whether a PBx is necessary [5]. Both DRE and serum PSA have low positive predictive value. A biomarker with high negative predictive value ensures confidence among the patients and health care providers for delaying undergoing biopsy of the prostate [5]. Our primary objective in doing this research was to compile a detailed inventory of all the diagnostic biomarkers now utilized in clinical practice, together with all of the relevant characteristics for each. Methodology: All papers published during the last fifteen years were considered, including original and reviews. Molecular markers, fractions of prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate health index (PHI), microseminoprotein-beta (MSMB), and prostate cancer markers were the keywords used to obtain articles from the Scopus and Pub Med databases. Conclusion: To prove their usefulness in diagnosing and prognosing prostate cancer, several biomarkers need more evidence. This research gap has to be filled so that unwanted prostate biopsies can be minimized. This helps in achievement of prompt diagnosis and best therapeutic response.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64149/j.carcinog.24.6s.306-311
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An update on the serum and urinary biomarkers in diagnosing prostate cancer

Journal of Carcinogenesis
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

An update on the serum and urinary biomarkers in diagnosing prostate cancer

article en

Abstract

Introduction: In terms of global health issues, prostate cancer ranks high. The prostate cancer diagnosis rate is on the rise in India, where it ranks as the second most frequent malignancy among men. Most of the prostate cancers are not life threatening, but one fifth of them end up with unfavorable outcome [1]. Transrectal prostate biopsy (PBx) is used to diagnose prostate cancer widely nowadays. The results of the digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or increased blood prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels are used to determine whether a PBx is necessary [5]. Both DRE and serum PSA have low positive predictive value. A biomarker with high negative predictive value ensures confidence among the patients and health care providers for delaying undergoing biopsy of the prostate [5]. Our primary objective in doing this research was to compile a detailed inventory of all the diagnostic biomarkers now utilized in clinical practice, together with all of the relevant characteristics for each. Methodology: All papers published during the last fifteen years were considered, including original and reviews. Molecular markers, fractions of prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate health index (PHI), microseminoprotein-beta (MSMB), and prostate cancer markers were the keywords used to obtain articles from the Scopus and Pub Med databases. Conclusion: To prove their usefulness in diagnosing and prognosing prostate cancer, several biomarkers need more evidence. This research gap has to be filled so that unwanted prostate biopsies can be minimized. This helps in achievement of prompt diagnosis and best therapeutic response.

Journal of CarcinogenesisVol. 24(6s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.