Behind the Myth: Land Sparing and Deforestation in Brazil
ABSTRACT The land sparing model, that is, the idea that agricultural intensification fosters environmental protection, lacks empirical validation. In Brazil, sustainable intensification through the conversion of degraded pastures into agricultural areas became a promising and widespread solution to deforestation. We investigate the mismatch between the land sparing discourse and the reality of productive and territorial strategies of large soybean producers in Brazil. We combined documental, fieldwork and secondary data from old (Mato Grosso), intermediate (Pará) and recent agricultural frontiers (Roraima). We argue that the land sparing narrative relies on a conceptual separation between modern agriculture and a land extensive ‘backward agriculture’ (on deforestation fronts). We show that many agroindustrial enterprises expand their activities from consolidated areas to agricultural frontiers, maintaining farms in both regions. For the agribusiness sector, maintaining the myth of sustainable ecological intensification is crucial to conceal its role in opening up new deforestation fronts across South America.
Authors
- Karina Kato (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2963-8361)
- Susanna B. Hecht (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-792X)
- Ludivine Eloy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-1993)
- Valdemar João Wesz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-7088)
Institutions
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana (BR)
- Université de Montpellier (FR)
- Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier (FR)
- Acteurs, Ressources et Territoires dans le Développement (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Agrarian Change
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.70045
- Primary Topic
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00