Effect of Varying Degrees of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Ervogastat, a Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) Inhibitor, and Clesacostat, an Acetyl‐CoA Carboxylase (ACC) Inhibitor

Ervogastat, a diacylglycerol-O-acyltransferase-2 inhibitor, and clesacostat, an acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor, are in clinical development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Study 1 and Study 2 were open-label, Phase 1 trials that assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of ervogastat (100 mg) and clesacostat (25 mg), respectively, in participants (n = 6/cohort) with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (HI) and compared to those without HI (reference). Plasma samples were analyzed for both total and unbound concentrations in Study 2 as clesacostat is highly protein bound. In Study 1, compared to participants without HI, ervogastat exposure (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) was 56%, 65%, and 52% higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively. However, when excluding PK data from a participant with unexplained low exposures in reference group, ervogastat exposures were similar between those with/without HI. In Study 2, total clesacostat exposure was 36%, 24%, and 19% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, as compared to reference group. Unbound clesacostat exposures were 70%, 83%, and 166% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI cohorts, respectively, with clesacostat plasma protein binding shown to decrease with increasing HI severity. Ervogastat and clesacostat were well tolerated with no clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or changes in vital signs and/or electrocardiograms observed. Observed exposures in HI studies were consistent with simulated exposures in MASH population. Taking into consideration the safety margins at the highest doses evaluated in Phase 2, no dose adjustment of ervogastat or clesacostat is currently warranted for patients with hepatic impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70106
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Varying Degrees of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Ervogastat, a Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) Inhibitor, and Clesacostat, an Acetyl‐CoA Carboxylase (ACC) Inhibitor

Manoli Vourvahis, Jim H. Hughes, Neeta B. Amin, Adam Ogden et al.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Effect of Varying Degrees of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Ervogastat, a Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) Inhibitor, and Clesacostat, an Acetyl‐CoA Carboxylase (ACC) Inhibitor

Manoli Vourvahis, Jim H. Hughes, Neeta B. Amin, Adam Ogden, J Gosset, Amit S.S. Kalgutkar, Arthur Bergman
article en

Abstract

Ervogastat, a diacylglycerol-O-acyltransferase-2 inhibitor, and clesacostat, an acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor, are in clinical development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Study 1 and Study 2 were open-label, Phase 1 trials that assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of ervogastat (100 mg) and clesacostat (25 mg), respectively, in participants (n = 6/cohort) with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (HI) and compared to those without HI (reference). Plasma samples were analyzed for both total and unbound concentrations in Study 2 as clesacostat is highly protein bound. In Study 1, compared to participants without HI, ervogastat exposure (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) was 56%, 65%, and 52% higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively. However, when excluding PK data from a participant with unexplained low exposures in reference group, ervogastat exposures were similar between those with/without HI. In Study 2, total clesacostat exposure was 36%, 24%, and 19% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, as compared to reference group. Unbound clesacostat exposures were 70%, 83%, and 166% higher for mild, moderate, and severe HI cohorts, respectively, with clesacostat plasma protein binding shown to decrease with increasing HI severity. Ervogastat and clesacostat were well tolerated with no clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or changes in vital signs and/or electrocardiograms observed. Observed exposures in HI studies were consistent with simulated exposures in MASH population. Taking into consideration the safety margins at the highest doses evaluated in Phase 2, no dose adjustment of ervogastat or clesacostat is currently warranted for patients with hepatic impairment.

The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 65(12)
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.