Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions—when to use what biopsy technique

In recent years, minimally invasive diagnostic options for breast lesions have expanded, but consensus on optimal biopsy techniques and imaging combinations remains lacking. This study, driven by an adapted RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and insights from eight experts in breast biopsy from across the world, aims to create consensus for selecting biopsy techniques. Highlighted findings suggest Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) for lesions visible exclusively at mammography/tomosynthesis (with or without contrast enhancement) or MRI. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) takes precedence for masses over 5 mm visible under US. The selection of other biopsy techniques during US-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. VAB is preferred for smaller masses (< 5 mm), complex cystic and solid lesions with small solid parts, small intraductal masses, architectural distortions, and calcifications visible on US. In re-biopsy scenarios for inconclusive findings or high-risk lesions, the panel suggests two VAB extensions: Extended Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (EVAB) for unambiguous lesion classification and Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) for complete lesion removal. Furthermore, the panel provides detailed input on how to handle specific cases, such as re-biopsy for lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Surgical excision is advised for DCIS and benign or borderline phyllodes tumors found through initial CNB or VAB. In conclusion, an international expert group formulated recommendations on diagnostic breast biopsies under image guidance, aiming to ensure accurate diagnosis worldwide by providing practical advice on needle selection and biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: Evidence-based literature on the preferred biopsy technique and imaging combination for the diagnosis of breast lesions is sparse, and a general consensus is not available. The selection of biopsy technique for different image-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. This international expert panel consensus statement addresses standard approaches for varying biopsy indications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02084-5
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions—when to use what biopsy technique

Alexandra Athanasiou, Henrique Lima Couto, Pooja Jagmohan, Wendelien B. G. Sanderink et al.
6 citations
Insights into Imaging
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
8.83
article

Image-guided biopsy of breast lesions—when to use what biopsy technique

Alexandra Athanasiou, Henrique Lima Couto, Pooja Jagmohan, Wendelien B. G. Sanderink, Jelle Wesseling, Julia Camps Herrero, Sara E. Vázquez-Manjarrez, Ritse M. Mann, Purvi Thakkar, Seigo Nakamura, Kirti Mehta
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In recent years, minimally invasive diagnostic options for breast lesions have expanded, but consensus on optimal biopsy techniques and imaging combinations remains lacking. This study, driven by an adapted RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and insights from eight experts in breast biopsy from across the world, aims to create consensus for selecting biopsy techniques. Highlighted findings suggest Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) for lesions visible exclusively at mammography/tomosynthesis (with or without contrast enhancement) or MRI. Core-needle biopsy (CNB) takes precedence for masses over 5 mm visible under US. The selection of other biopsy techniques during US-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. VAB is preferred for smaller masses (< 5 mm), complex cystic and solid lesions with small solid parts, small intraductal masses, architectural distortions, and calcifications visible on US. In re-biopsy scenarios for inconclusive findings or high-risk lesions, the panel suggests two VAB extensions: Extended Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (EVAB) for unambiguous lesion classification and Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) for complete lesion removal. Furthermore, the panel provides detailed input on how to handle specific cases, such as re-biopsy for lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Surgical excision is advised for DCIS and benign or borderline phyllodes tumors found through initial CNB or VAB. In conclusion, an international expert group formulated recommendations on diagnostic breast biopsies under image guidance, aiming to ensure accurate diagnosis worldwide by providing practical advice on needle selection and biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: Evidence-based literature on the preferred biopsy technique and imaging combination for the diagnosis of breast lesions is sparse, and a general consensus is not available. The selection of biopsy technique for different image-guided procedures depends on lesion type, size, and sampling indication. This international expert panel consensus statement addresses standard approaches for varying biopsy indications.

Insights into ImagingVol. 16(1)
SHOWA Medical University (JP), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), National University of Singapore (SG), Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Hospital de La Ribera (ES), Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX), Eastern Health (AU), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Oncode Institute (NL), Universidade de Marília (BR), Hospital Casa de Salud (ES), Mitera Hospital (GR), National University Hospital (SG)
BD
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
8.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.