Open science in democracy research: the research infrastructure “Monitoring Electoral Democracy” (MEDem)

Abstract Ensuring universal access to scientific research and upholding the principles of keeping data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable is of paramount importance to the democratization of science. However, upholding these principles becomes increasingly complex with the increasing scope of data collection, the more different types of data we collect (e.g., survey, text, or institutional and country-level macro data), and the more research teams are involved in data collection. In the domain of democracy research, scientists across Europe are therefore joining forces to launch the research infrastructure monitoring electoral democracy (MEDem), which aims to establish itself as an open platform where the fragmented crowd of researchers in the various research fields can coordinate and develop common standards for data collection both retrospectively as well as prospectively to make their data interoperable, and (comparative) democracy research more productive. Moreover, MEDem will help make democracy research data and findings accessible to the general public (e.g., citizens, journalists, and policymakers).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-025-00534-8
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open science in democracy research: the research infrastructure “Monitoring Electoral Democracy” (MEDem)

Αλεξία Κατσανίδου, Georg Lütz, Jakob‐Moritz Eberl, Sylvia Kritzinger et al.
European Political Science
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Open science in democracy research: the research infrastructure “Monitoring Electoral Democracy” (MEDem)

Αλεξία Κατσανίδου, Georg Lütz, Jakob‐Moritz Eberl, Sylvia Kritzinger, Johanna Willmann, Hajo G. Boomgaarden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ensuring universal access to scientific research and upholding the principles of keeping data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable is of paramount importance to the democratization of science. However, upholding these principles becomes increasingly complex with the increasing scope of data collection, the more different types of data we collect (e.g., survey, text, or institutional and country-level macro data), and the more research teams are involved in data collection. In the domain of democracy research, scientists across Europe are therefore joining forces to launch the research infrastructure monitoring electoral democracy (MEDem), which aims to establish itself as an open platform where the fragmented crowd of researchers in the various research fields can coordinate and develop common standards for data collection both retrospectively as well as prospectively to make their data interoperable, and (comparative) democracy research more productive. Moreover, MEDem will help make democracy research data and findings accessible to the general public (e.g., citizens, journalists, and policymakers).

European Political ScienceVol. 24(4)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Cologne (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE), Government of Lower Austria (AT), University of Lausanne (CH)
Universität Wien, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.