The state of the human coding gene catalogues

In 2018, we analysed the three main repositories for the human proteome: Ensembl/GENCODE, RefSeq, and UniProtKB. At that time the three gene sets disagreed on the coding status of one of every eight annotated coding genes, and our results suggested that as many as 4234 of these genes might not be correctly classified. Here, we have repeated the analysis with updated versions of the three reference gene sets. Superficially, little appears to have changed. The three sets annotate 21 871 coding genes, slightly fewer than previously, and still disagree on the status of 2603 annotated genes, almost one in eight. However, we show that collaborations between the three reference gene sets have led to greater consensus. Reference catalogues have agreed on the coding status of another 249 genes since the last analysis while at least 700 genes have been reclassified. We still find that there are >2000 coding genes with at least one potential non-coding feature to indicate that they may not be coding genes. This includes a large majority of the 2603 genes for which annotators do not agree on coding status. In total, we believe that as many as 3000 genes may be misclassified as coding and could be annotated as non-coding genes, pseudogenes, or cancer antigens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Database
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaf045
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The state of the human coding gene catalogues

Daniel Cerdán-Vélez, Michael L. Tress, Miguel Maquedano
2 citations
Database
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
1.61
article

The state of the human coding gene catalogues

Daniel Cerdán-Vélez, Michael L. Tress, Miguel Maquedano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In 2018, we analysed the three main repositories for the human proteome: Ensembl/GENCODE, RefSeq, and UniProtKB. At that time the three gene sets disagreed on the coding status of one of every eight annotated coding genes, and our results suggested that as many as 4234 of these genes might not be correctly classified. Here, we have repeated the analysis with updated versions of the three reference gene sets. Superficially, little appears to have changed. The three sets annotate 21 871 coding genes, slightly fewer than previously, and still disagree on the status of 2603 annotated genes, almost one in eight. However, we show that collaborations between the three reference gene sets have led to greater consensus. Reference catalogues have agreed on the coding status of another 249 genes since the last analysis while at least 700 genes have been reclassified. We still find that there are >2000 coding genes with at least one potential non-coding feature to indicate that they may not be coding genes. This includes a large majority of the 2603 genes for which annotators do not agree on coding status. In total, we believe that as many as 3000 genes may be misclassified as coding and could be annotated as non-coding genes, pseudogenes, or cancer antigens.

DatabaseVol. 2025
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The state of the human coding gene catalogues — Daniel Cerdán-Vélez, Michael L. Tress, et al. · Database (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS