A Somewhat Different Perspective on Occupational Prestige Ratings

This study presents previously unpublished empirical surveys on the assessment of occupational prestige in Germany from the years 1990, 1997, and 1999. The analysis of individual judgment patterns reveals substantial differences with respect to the absolute judgment level and the differentiation among occupations. Nonetheless, an extraordinarily high degree of relative agreement among raters is evident. The average correlation between two raters is .60, the average agreement of individuals with the group judgment is .77, and the reliability of the group standards is nearly perfect. The correlation between the standards of male and female raters, between male and female occupational titles, and between raters from East Germany and West Germany exceeds .96. Comparisons with German surveys from the 1950s to 2018 and studies from China, Great Britain, Poland, Sweden, Spain, South Korea, Hungary, and the USA from 1925 to 2024 demonstrate high to very high levels of agreement. Nevertheless, beneath the surface of these overwhelming commonalities, several systematic temporal trends and local peculiarities can be identified.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Qeios
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32388/jg9o38
Primary Topic
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Somewhat Different Perspective on Occupational Prestige Ratings

Ronald Henss
Qeios
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
article

A Somewhat Different Perspective on Occupational Prestige Ratings

Ronald Henss
article en

Abstract

This study presents previously unpublished empirical surveys on the assessment of occupational prestige in Germany from the years 1990, 1997, and 1999. The analysis of individual judgment patterns reveals substantial differences with respect to the absolute judgment level and the differentiation among occupations. Nonetheless, an extraordinarily high degree of relative agreement among raters is evident. The average correlation between two raters is .60, the average agreement of individuals with the group judgment is .77, and the reliability of the group standards is nearly perfect. The correlation between the standards of male and female raters, between male and female occupational titles, and between raters from East Germany and West Germany exceeds .96. Comparisons with German surveys from the 1950s to 2018 and studies from China, Great Britain, Poland, Sweden, Spain, South Korea, Hungary, and the USA from 1925 to 2024 demonstrate high to very high levels of agreement. Nevertheless, beneath the surface of these overwhelming commonalities, several systematic temporal trends and local peculiarities can be identified.

Qeios
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.