A Perspective on the Role of Motivated Thinking in Research on Black Representation in Science

Representation in science, science curricular development, and scientific outcomes is driven by our motivated thinking and reasoning. This in turn influences how we reason about issues related to equity, diversity, inclusion, and social justice. This paper unpacks perspectives about the influence of motivated thinking on representation and on perceptions of representation in the science curricula, more specifically Black representation in the qualitative and quantitative works of the first author. Motivated thinking influences many aspects of science and science education, including the research questions we choose, the scientists whom we choose to highlight in our classroom examples, the outcomes we desire from our research and teaching, and even the scope of our scientific disciplines. Molden and Higgins' breakdown of motivated thinking is used to frame observations about the influence of motivated thinking on the outcomes and processes of research, and to provide thought provoking questions and considerations given our current, future, and past social, cultural, political, historical, and scientific context and underpinnings. As a perspective piece, this paper toggles between the first-person narrations of the first author and the supporting research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaf155
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Perspective on the Role of Motivated Thinking in Research on Black Representation in Science

Stacy C. Farina, Catherine L. Quinlan
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

A Perspective on the Role of Motivated Thinking in Research on Black Representation in Science

Stacy C. Farina, Catherine L. Quinlan
article en

Abstract

Representation in science, science curricular development, and scientific outcomes is driven by our motivated thinking and reasoning. This in turn influences how we reason about issues related to equity, diversity, inclusion, and social justice. This paper unpacks perspectives about the influence of motivated thinking on representation and on perceptions of representation in the science curricula, more specifically Black representation in the qualitative and quantitative works of the first author. Motivated thinking influences many aspects of science and science education, including the research questions we choose, the scientists whom we choose to highlight in our classroom examples, the outcomes we desire from our research and teaching, and even the scope of our scientific disciplines. Molden and Higgins' breakdown of motivated thinking is used to frame observations about the influence of motivated thinking on the outcomes and processes of research, and to provide thought provoking questions and considerations given our current, future, and past social, cultural, political, historical, and scientific context and underpinnings. As a perspective piece, this paper toggles between the first-person narrations of the first author and the supporting research.

Integrative and Comparative BiologyVol. 65(6)
North Carolina Central University (US), Howard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.