Distinction between ice phases VII, VIII, and X

Ice phases VII, VIII, and X are all based on a body-centered cubic arrangement of molecules, the differences coming from how molecular orientation breaks the symmetry. It is debatable as to whether these should even be considered distinct phases given that the standard definition of a transition between distinct phases involves a discontinuity in any derivative of the free energy. This can be hard to prove experimentally, and most previous theoretical works have been based on models which either have continuously differentiable free energies or offer no straightforward way to determine the free energy. Here we build a free-energy model based on the common definitions of the phases: ordered ice-VIII, orientationally disordered ice VII, and centered-proton ice X. All transitions in this model might or might not be associated with a discontinuity in the specific heat, depending on parameterization. By comparing with data, we find that a VII-X transition line exists, but it ends in a critical point hidden within the stability field of phase VIII. If the model is correct, there is a discontinuity between VII and X, so they are separate phases. We propose that the hidden phase boundary might be demonstrated experimentally by compression of supercooled ice VII.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/nmlm-rtxz
Citations
1
Primary Topic
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinction between ice phases VII, VIII, and X

J. S. Loveday, Kazuki Komatsu, K. Yamashita, Andreas Hermann et al.
1 citations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
1.30
article

Distinction between ice phases VII, VIII, and X

J. S. Loveday, Kazuki Komatsu, K. Yamashita, Andreas Hermann, Graeme J. Ackland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ice phases VII, VIII, and X are all based on a body-centered cubic arrangement of molecules, the differences coming from how molecular orientation breaks the symmetry. It is debatable as to whether these should even be considered distinct phases given that the standard definition of a transition between distinct phases involves a discontinuity in any derivative of the free energy. This can be hard to prove experimentally, and most previous theoretical works have been based on models which either have continuously differentiable free energies or offer no straightforward way to determine the free energy. Here we build a free-energy model based on the common definitions of the phases: ordered ice-VIII, orientationally disordered ice VII, and centered-proton ice X. All transitions in this model might or might not be associated with a discontinuity in the specific heat, depending on parameterization. By comparing with data, we find that a VII-X transition line exists, but it ends in a critical point hidden within the stability field of phase VIII. If the model is correct, there is a discontinuity between VII and X, so they are separate phases. We propose that the hidden phase boundary might be demonstrated experimentally by compression of supercooled ice VII.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 112(9)
The University of Tokyo (JP), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.