Batch spacing optimization by reinforcement learning

Beams designated for the LHC are injected into the SPS in multiple batches. Given the tight spacing of 200 ns between these batches, the injection kickers have to be precisely synchronized with the injected beam to minimize injection oscillations. Due to machine drift, the optimal settings for the kickers vary. This paper presents an active controller trained by reinforcement learning that counteracts the machine drifts by adjusting the settings. The agent was exclusively trained in a simulation environment and directly transferred to the accelerator. Although its results are slightly worse than those obtained by an explicit numerical optimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm, the agent attains these results much faster since it requires far less computation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/g9wr-197z
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Batch spacing optimization by reinforcement learning

Francesco Velotti, Sharwin Rezagholi, Matthias Remta
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
article

Batch spacing optimization by reinforcement learning

Francesco Velotti, Sharwin Rezagholi, Matthias Remta
article en

Abstract

Beams designated for the LHC are injected into the SPS in multiple batches. Given the tight spacing of 200 ns between these batches, the injection kickers have to be precisely synchronized with the injected beam to minimize injection oscillations. Due to machine drift, the optimal settings for the kickers vary. This paper presents an active controller trained by reinforcement learning that counteracts the machine drifts by adjusting the settings. The agent was exclusively trained in a simulation environment and directly transferred to the accelerator. Although its results are slightly worse than those obtained by an explicit numerical optimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm, the agent attains these results much faster since it requires far less computation.

Physical Review Accelerators and BeamsVol. 28(9)
University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien (AT), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.