The Psychology of Misinformation: How People Process Fake News on Social Media

This study explores the psychological underpinnings of misinformation processing on social media, focusing on the role of cognitive biases—specifically confirmation bias and motivated reasoning—in shaping individuals’ belief in fake news. Using an experimental design, 200 participants were exposed to both real and fabricated news articles, with belief levels assessed before and after exposure. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between cognitive bias scores and susceptibility to misinformation, confirming that individuals with higher bias levels are more likely to accept and trust false information. Regression analysis demonstrated that confirmation bias significantly heightened belief in fake news, while motivated reasoning reinforced acceptance of content aligned with personal or ideological preferences. These results support dual-system theory, highlighting the dominance of fast, intuitive thinking (System 1) in social media environments that encourage rapid, uncritical judgments. The study emphasizes the importance of media literacy interventions and platform-level strategies such as fact-checking and debunking to mitigate the impact of cognitive biases. Although limited by reliance on self-reported measures and demographic scope, this research contributes to understanding how psychological mechanisms amplify misinformation, offering theoretical and practical insights into combating fake news in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63056/acad.004.03.0803
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Psychology of Misinformation: How People Process Fake News on Social Media

Abida Kalsoom
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

The Psychology of Misinformation: How People Process Fake News on Social Media

Abida Kalsoom
article en

Abstract

This study explores the psychological underpinnings of misinformation processing on social media, focusing on the role of cognitive biases—specifically confirmation bias and motivated reasoning—in shaping individuals’ belief in fake news. Using an experimental design, 200 participants were exposed to both real and fabricated news articles, with belief levels assessed before and after exposure. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between cognitive bias scores and susceptibility to misinformation, confirming that individuals with higher bias levels are more likely to accept and trust false information. Regression analysis demonstrated that confirmation bias significantly heightened belief in fake news, while motivated reasoning reinforced acceptance of content aligned with personal or ideological preferences. These results support dual-system theory, highlighting the dominance of fast, intuitive thinking (System 1) in social media environments that encourage rapid, uncritical judgments. The study emphasizes the importance of media literacy interventions and platform-level strategies such as fact-checking and debunking to mitigate the impact of cognitive biases. Although limited by reliance on self-reported measures and demographic scope, this research contributes to understanding how psychological mechanisms amplify misinformation, offering theoretical and practical insights into combating fake news in the digital age.

ACADEMIA International Journal for Social SciencesVol. 4(3)
University of Leicester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.