Credibility assessment of patient-specific modeling in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. I. A population-based validation of patient-specific modeling

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a standardized treatment for aortic valve stenosis, supported by computational modeling to enhance procedural planning. However, the credibility of TAVI simulations requires rigorous validation following regulatory standards. This study aims to perform a population-based validation of the structural and hemodynamic simulation performance of the SAPIEN 3 (S3) Ultra device by comparing computational predictions with clinical post-TAVI data, following the ASME V&V 40 framework. A patient-specific structural model followed by fluid-structure interaction was developed to simulate S3 deployment and then assess post-TAVI hemodynamics in 20 patients. Structural parameters (device diameters) and hemodynamic indices (effective orifice area, EOA, and transmural pressure gradient, TPG) were extracted. Validation was performed using empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) analysis, with an acceptance threshold of 5% for model credibility. EOA and TPG predictions showed reasonable agreement with echocardiographic data (errors within 10%). ECDF-based comparison demonstrated a high level of accuracy for device diameters (≤5% area metric), whereas hemodynamic parameters exhibited slightly greater discrepancies, potentially due to clinical measurement variability. This study establishes a robust computational validation framework for patient-specific TAVI modeling, ensuring regulatory compliance and clinical applicability. These findings highlight the potential of <i>in silico</i> trials to support TAVI planning and decision-making. This study is complemented by a second part dedicated to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
APL Bioengineering
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0280958
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Credibility assessment of patient-specific modeling in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. I. A population-based validation of patient-specific modeling

Chiara Catalano, Caterina Maria Gandolfo, Stefano Cannata, Nils Götzen et al.
1 citations
APL Bioengineering
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
article

Credibility assessment of patient-specific modeling in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. I. A population-based validation of patient-specific modeling

Chiara Catalano, Caterina Maria Gandolfo, Stefano Cannata, Nils Götzen, Salvatore Pasta, Giovanni Gentile, Vincent Bouwman, Roberta Scuoppo, T. Turgut
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a standardized treatment for aortic valve stenosis, supported by computational modeling to enhance procedural planning. However, the credibility of TAVI simulations requires rigorous validation following regulatory standards. This study aims to perform a population-based validation of the structural and hemodynamic simulation performance of the SAPIEN 3 (S3) Ultra device by comparing computational predictions with clinical post-TAVI data, following the ASME V&V 40 framework. A patient-specific structural model followed by fluid-structure interaction was developed to simulate S3 deployment and then assess post-TAVI hemodynamics in 20 patients. Structural parameters (device diameters) and hemodynamic indices (effective orifice area, EOA, and transmural pressure gradient, TPG) were extracted. Validation was performed using empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) analysis, with an acceptance threshold of 5% for model credibility. EOA and TPG predictions showed reasonable agreement with echocardiographic data (errors within 10%). ECDF-based comparison demonstrated a high level of accuracy for device diameters (≤5% area metric), whereas hemodynamic parameters exhibited slightly greater discrepancies, potentially due to clinical measurement variability. This study establishes a robust computational validation framework for patient-specific TAVI modeling, ensuring regulatory compliance and clinical applicability. These findings highlight the potential of <i>in silico</i> trials to support TAVI planning and decision-making. This study is complemented by a second part dedicated to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis.

APL BioengineeringVol. 9(4)
Dr. F.P. Fischer-Stichting (Netherlands) (NL), International YMCA University of Applied Sciences (DE), Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.