Personalized treatment in HPV+ oropharynx cancer using genomic adjusted radiation dose

BACKGROUNDA key objective in managing HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is reducing radiation therapy (RT) doses without compromising cure rates. A recent phase II/III HN005 trial revealed that clinical factors alone are insufficient to guide safe RT dose de-escalation. Our prior research demonstrated that the genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD) predicts RT benefit and may inform dose selection. We hypothesize that GARD can guide personalized RT de-escalation in HPV+ OPSCC patients.METHODSGene expression profiles were analyzed in 191 HPV+ OPSCC patients enrolled in an international, multi-institutional observational study (AJCC Eighth Edition, stages I-III). Most patients received 70 Gy in 35 fractions or 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions (median dose: 70 Gy; range: 51.0-74.0 Gy). Overall survival (OS) was 94.1% at 36 months and 87.3% at 60 months. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed association between GARD and OS, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses compared GARD with traditional clinical predictors.RESULTSDespite uniform RT dosing, GARD showed wide heterogeneity, ranging from 15.4 to 71.7. Higher GARD values were significantly associated with improved OS in univariate (HR = 0.941, P = 0.041) and multivariable analyses (HR = 0.943, P = 0.046), while T and N stages were not. GARD demonstrated superior predictive performance at 36 months (AUC = 78.26) versus clinical variables (AUC = 71.20). Two GARD-based RT de-escalation strategies were identified, offering potential survival benefits while reducing radiation exposure.CONCLUSIONGARD predicts OS and outperforms clinical variables, supporting its integration into the diagnostic workflow for personalized RT in HPV+ OPSCC.FUNDINGThis work was supported by the National Cancer Institute through the Cleveland Clinic/Emory ROBIN center (U54-CA274513, project 2), the European Union Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (grant/award 689715), the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC project ID 23573), and the European Research Area Network ERA PerMed JTC2019/Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica project SuPerTreat (Supporting Personalized Treatment Decisions in Head and Neck Cancer through Big Data).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1172/jci194073
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized treatment in HPV+ oropharynx cancer using genomic adjusted radiation dose

James N. Bates, Shauna Campbell, Shlomo A. Koyfman, Jacob A. Miller et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
7.39
article

Personalized treatment in HPV+ oropharynx cancer using genomic adjusted radiation dose

James N. Bates, Shauna Campbell, Shlomo A. Koyfman, Jacob A. Miller, Kailin Yang, F. Hoebers, Jacob G. Scott, Tito Poli, Emily Ho, Lisa Francesca Licitra, Michael W. Kattan, Jessica Scarborough, Loris De Cecco, Jimmy J. Caudell, Shivani Nellore, Natalie L. Silver, Geoffrey Sedor, Stefano Cavalieri, Kathrin Scheckenbach, Ruud H. Brakenhoff, Javier F. Torres–Roca, Steven A. Eschrich, N.M. Woody, Tim Chan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUNDA key objective in managing HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is reducing radiation therapy (RT) doses without compromising cure rates. A recent phase II/III HN005 trial revealed that clinical factors alone are insufficient to guide safe RT dose de-escalation. Our prior research demonstrated that the genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD) predicts RT benefit and may inform dose selection. We hypothesize that GARD can guide personalized RT de-escalation in HPV+ OPSCC patients.METHODSGene expression profiles were analyzed in 191 HPV+ OPSCC patients enrolled in an international, multi-institutional observational study (AJCC Eighth Edition, stages I-III). Most patients received 70 Gy in 35 fractions or 69.96 Gy in 33 fractions (median dose: 70 Gy; range: 51.0-74.0 Gy). Overall survival (OS) was 94.1% at 36 months and 87.3% at 60 months. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed association between GARD and OS, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses compared GARD with traditional clinical predictors.RESULTSDespite uniform RT dosing, GARD showed wide heterogeneity, ranging from 15.4 to 71.7. Higher GARD values were significantly associated with improved OS in univariate (HR = 0.941, P = 0.041) and multivariable analyses (HR = 0.943, P = 0.046), while T and N stages were not. GARD demonstrated superior predictive performance at 36 months (AUC = 78.26) versus clinical variables (AUC = 71.20). Two GARD-based RT de-escalation strategies were identified, offering potential survival benefits while reducing radiation exposure.CONCLUSIONGARD predicts OS and outperforms clinical variables, supporting its integration into the diagnostic workflow for personalized RT in HPV+ OPSCC.FUNDINGThis work was supported by the National Cancer Institute through the Cleveland Clinic/Emory ROBIN center (U54-CA274513, project 2), the European Union Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (grant/award 689715), the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC project ID 23573), and the European Research Area Network ERA PerMed JTC2019/Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica project SuPerTreat (Supporting Personalized Treatment Decisions in Head and Neck Cancer through Big Data).

Journal of Clinical InvestigationVol. 135(19)
University of Parma (IT), University of Iowa (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Emory University (US), University of Milan (IT), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Maastro Clinic (NL), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Case Western Reserve University (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Emory University, Cleveland Clinic, European Commission, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
7.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.