Effects of cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy : A randomized controlled pilot trial

BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) is an important public health issue worldwide. Manual therapy is a valid treatment option for CR.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with CR.Methods47 participants were recruited and randomly divided into Group A (n = 25) and Group B (n = 22) using random number table method. Group A received both cervical and lumbar mobilization, while Group B only received cervical mobilization. The experiment conducted 12 sessions over four weeks. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured pre and post the experiment.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline indicators between the two groups pre the experiment (P > . 05). Four weeks later, compared pre and post within the group, both groups showed improvement in NDI, VAS, and ROM (P < . 05), with Group A showing slightly higher improvement in various indicators than Group B; Compared between groups, Group B showed significant improvements in flexion [mean difference 2.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 4.74, t = 2.19, P = 0.033], extension [2.76; 0.94 to 4.57, t = 3.06, P = 0.004], left flexion [3.12; 1.45 to 4.80, t = 3.75, P < 0.00], right flexion [3.08; 1.43 to 4.74, t = 3.76, P < 0.00], while NDI, VAS, left rotation, and right rotation ROM did not show significant differences (P > . 05).ConclusionsCervico-lumbar combination mobilization therapy can improve flexion, extension, left and right flexion ROM in patients with CR, and the improvement in cervical dysfunction and pain were not superior to cervical mobilization alone. The cervico-lumbar combination therapy provides a new perspective for manual therapists and is expected to attract the attention of clinical practitioners. Further clinical studies are needed in the future to confirm the actual impact of combination manual therapy on the symptoms and signs of the CR population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251381073
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy : A randomized controlled pilot trial

Liu Ziqing, He Cao, Shuyun Lan, Li Zhangjie et al.
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Effects of cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy : A randomized controlled pilot trial

Liu Ziqing, He Cao, Shuyun Lan, Li Zhangjie, Yu Qiangqiang, Duan Chaoyang
article en

Abstract

BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) is an important public health issue worldwide. Manual therapy is a valid treatment option for CR.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with CR.Methods47 participants were recruited and randomly divided into Group A (n = 25) and Group B (n = 22) using random number table method. Group A received both cervical and lumbar mobilization, while Group B only received cervical mobilization. The experiment conducted 12 sessions over four weeks. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured pre and post the experiment.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline indicators between the two groups pre the experiment (P > . 05). Four weeks later, compared pre and post within the group, both groups showed improvement in NDI, VAS, and ROM (P < . 05), with Group A showing slightly higher improvement in various indicators than Group B; Compared between groups, Group B showed significant improvements in flexion [mean difference 2.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 4.74, t = 2.19, P = 0.033], extension [2.76; 0.94 to 4.57, t = 3.06, P = 0.004], left flexion [3.12; 1.45 to 4.80, t = 3.75, P < 0.00], right flexion [3.08; 1.43 to 4.74, t = 3.76, P < 0.00], while NDI, VAS, left rotation, and right rotation ROM did not show significant differences (P > . 05).ConclusionsCervico-lumbar combination mobilization therapy can improve flexion, extension, left and right flexion ROM in patients with CR, and the improvement in cervical dysfunction and pain were not superior to cervical mobilization alone. The cervico-lumbar combination therapy provides a new perspective for manual therapists and is expected to attract the attention of clinical practitioners. Further clinical studies are needed in the future to confirm the actual impact of combination manual therapy on the symptoms and signs of the CR population.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal RehabilitationVol. 39(2)
YangPu Geriatric Hospital (CN), Yangpu Hospital of Tongji University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.