The Evolution of Function in the DNA-Binding Domain of the CRP/FNR Family

Transcriptional regulation, facilitated by transcription factors (TFs), contributes to bacterial response to environmental and cellular perturbations. How have TFs diversified and gained their functions? We use the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP)/regulator of fumarate and nitrate reductase (FNR) family to study this question across ∼6,000 prokaryotic genomes. Characterized by homology to TFs CRP and FNR in Escherichia coli, the two functions of this family-sequence-specific DNA binding and transcriptional activation by direct contacts to RNA polymerase-are conferred by the helix-turn-helix containing DNA-binding domain. We constructed a rooted phylogeny of this domain and performed residue conservation analysis on extant and in silico reconstructed ancestral sequences of CRP/FNR family members. The overall ancestor of the sequence family does not fall into classes containing either E. coli CRP (Eco-CRP) or E. coli FNR (Eco-FNR) clades, but instead a large and diverse class that we call "CRP-like." Residues key for base-specific DNA binding remain largely conserved in the family, and likely emerged in the family common ancestor. Residues (together called activating region 1 site [AR1]) that make direct contacts with α-C-terminal domain (αCTD) of RNA polymerase are conserved only in the Eco-CRP class and restricted to Gammaproteobacteria. The corresponding "287 determinant" interface on αCTD is again fully conserved only in Gammaproteobacteria, which contain Eco-CRP members, following stepwise evolution initiated at the Proteobacterial common ancestor. These suggest suggesting co-emergence of the interface residues in Eco-CRP. Our analysis hence shows that class I transcriptional activation through AR1 on CRP and the determinant of αCTD, as described in E. coli CRP, is phylogenetically restricted, while base-specific DNA binding has been present in the CRP/FNR family throughout its evolutionary history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genome Biology and Evolution
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaf182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of Function in the DNA-Binding Domain of the CRP/FNR Family

Aswin Sai Narain Seshasayee, Madhumitha Krishnaswamy
1 citations
Genome Biology and Evolution
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
1.82
article

The Evolution of Function in the DNA-Binding Domain of the CRP/FNR Family

Aswin Sai Narain Seshasayee, Madhumitha Krishnaswamy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation, facilitated by transcription factors (TFs), contributes to bacterial response to environmental and cellular perturbations. How have TFs diversified and gained their functions? We use the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP)/regulator of fumarate and nitrate reductase (FNR) family to study this question across ∼6,000 prokaryotic genomes. Characterized by homology to TFs CRP and FNR in Escherichia coli, the two functions of this family-sequence-specific DNA binding and transcriptional activation by direct contacts to RNA polymerase-are conferred by the helix-turn-helix containing DNA-binding domain. We constructed a rooted phylogeny of this domain and performed residue conservation analysis on extant and in silico reconstructed ancestral sequences of CRP/FNR family members. The overall ancestor of the sequence family does not fall into classes containing either E. coli CRP (Eco-CRP) or E. coli FNR (Eco-FNR) clades, but instead a large and diverse class that we call "CRP-like." Residues key for base-specific DNA binding remain largely conserved in the family, and likely emerged in the family common ancestor. Residues (together called activating region 1 site [AR1]) that make direct contacts with α-C-terminal domain (αCTD) of RNA polymerase are conserved only in the Eco-CRP class and restricted to Gammaproteobacteria. The corresponding "287 determinant" interface on αCTD is again fully conserved only in Gammaproteobacteria, which contain Eco-CRP members, following stepwise evolution initiated at the Proteobacterial common ancestor. These suggest suggesting co-emergence of the interface residues in Eco-CRP. Our analysis hence shows that class I transcriptional activation through AR1 on CRP and the determinant of αCTD, as described in E. coli CRP, is phylogenetically restricted, while base-specific DNA binding has been present in the CRP/FNR family throughout its evolutionary history.

Genome Biology and EvolutionVol. 17(10)
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN), National Centre for Biological Sciences (IN), Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Tirupati (IN)
Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.