Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between 2 Expandable Cage Designs in Navigation-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

<h3>Background</h3> Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) often struggles to provide sufficient lordotic alignment restoration. The choice of cage design, including its height and lordotic angle, is critical. This study compares 2 expandable cage designs in MIS-TLIF: one that increases only disc height (group H) and another that expands both height and lordosis (group HL). <h3>Methods</h3> Seventy-five patients who underwent navigation-assisted MIS-TLIF using expandable cages were reviewed. These included 35 cases using expandable cages that increase only height (group H) and 40 cases using cages that expand both height and lordosis (group HL). Clinical outcomes, including a numeric rating scale of back pain, leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index and radiographic parameters, including disc height, lordotic angle, subsidence, and fusion rates, were evaluated. <h3>Results</h3> Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical outcomes, with no differences between groups. Postoperative disc and foraminal height increased significantly. At the 1-year follow-up, group HL demonstrated greater improvements in segmental lordosis (4.0° ± 3.3° vs 1.9° ± 5.4°, <i>P</i> = 0.018) and disc angle (5.8° ± 4.1° vs 1.9° ± 4.2°, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) compared with group H. The overall fusion rate was 92%, and the overall subsidence rate was 32%, which decreased to 20% after the first 20 cases. No neurological injuries occurred, and there were no significant differences in complications between the groups. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This study demonstrates that MIS-TLIF with expandable cages designed to increase lordosis offers superior improvement in segmental lordosis at the 1-year follow-up, compared with expandable cages that only expand disc height. Both cage designs achieved high fusion rates and showed similar clinical outcomes. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> The surgeon’s experience in the use of expandable cages is a critical factor in reducing the risk of cage subsidence, a complication that may adversely affect clinical outcomes. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8797
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between 2 Expandable Cage Designs in Navigation-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Minaam Farooq, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Ibrahim Hussain, Khanathip Jitpakdee et al.
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between 2 Expandable Cage Designs in Navigation-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Minaam Farooq, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Ibrahim Hussain, Khanathip Jitpakdee, Edna E. Gouveia, Blake I. Boadi, Roger Härtl, Fabian Sommer, Jessica Berger
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) often struggles to provide sufficient lordotic alignment restoration. The choice of cage design, including its height and lordotic angle, is critical. This study compares 2 expandable cage designs in MIS-TLIF: one that increases only disc height (group H) and another that expands both height and lordosis (group HL). <h3>Methods</h3> Seventy-five patients who underwent navigation-assisted MIS-TLIF using expandable cages were reviewed. These included 35 cases using expandable cages that increase only height (group H) and 40 cases using cages that expand both height and lordosis (group HL). Clinical outcomes, including a numeric rating scale of back pain, leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index and radiographic parameters, including disc height, lordotic angle, subsidence, and fusion rates, were evaluated. <h3>Results</h3> Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical outcomes, with no differences between groups. Postoperative disc and foraminal height increased significantly. At the 1-year follow-up, group HL demonstrated greater improvements in segmental lordosis (4.0° ± 3.3° vs 1.9° ± 5.4°, <i>P</i> = 0.018) and disc angle (5.8° ± 4.1° vs 1.9° ± 4.2°, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) compared with group H. The overall fusion rate was 92%, and the overall subsidence rate was 32%, which decreased to 20% after the first 20 cases. No neurological injuries occurred, and there were no significant differences in complications between the groups. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This study demonstrates that MIS-TLIF with expandable cages designed to increase lordosis offers superior improvement in segmental lordosis at the 1-year follow-up, compared with expandable cages that only expand disc height. Both cage designs achieved high fusion rates and showed similar clinical outcomes. <h3>Clinical Relevance</h3> The surgeon’s experience in the use of expandable cages is a critical factor in reducing the risk of cage subsidence, a complication that may adversely affect clinical outcomes. <h3>Level of Evidence</h3> 3.

The International Journal of Spine SurgeryVol. 19(5)
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Cornell University (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Memorial Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.