Detection Biases and Methodological Impacts in Exoplanet Discovery

A lot more information about planets outside our solar system is available now due to exoplanet discoveries. However, the biases introduced by detection methods like Transit and Radial Velocity affect the observed characteristics of detected exoplanets. This work examined how various exoplanet discovery methods shape the observed characteristics of the detected exoplanet population. Advanced statistical analysis and machine learning techniques were used to preprocess the obtained exoplanet dataset and to assess biases in the detection methods. This study represents a unified statistical and machine learning-based framework to quantify and visualize detection biases across discovery methods based upon a comprehensive data set, as compared to previous works that focused on certain detection techniques or a single planetary characteristic. The dataset contained 23 planetary, stellar, and observational parameters obtained from the NASA Exoplanet Archive. The findings showed that the Transit method is biased towards the detection of short-period, low-eccentricity planets, whereas Radial Velocity is suitable for detecting massive planets around larger stars. High-mass and long-period planets are detected by imaging methods. Microlensing is the least biased but underused. Box, Violin and KDE plots show how the biases in detection methods lead to an incomplete picture of exoplanets. Improvement in detection methods is necessary to better understand exoplanets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icscsa66339.2025.11170927
Primary Topic
SAS software applications and methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection Biases and Methodological Impacts in Exoplanet Discovery

Sera Mirchandani, Vinay Vishwakarma
SAS software applications and methods
article

Detection Biases and Methodological Impacts in Exoplanet Discovery

Sera Mirchandani, Vinay Vishwakarma
article en

Abstract

A lot more information about planets outside our solar system is available now due to exoplanet discoveries. However, the biases introduced by detection methods like Transit and Radial Velocity affect the observed characteristics of detected exoplanets. This work examined how various exoplanet discovery methods shape the observed characteristics of the detected exoplanet population. Advanced statistical analysis and machine learning techniques were used to preprocess the obtained exoplanet dataset and to assess biases in the detection methods. This study represents a unified statistical and machine learning-based framework to quantify and visualize detection biases across discovery methods based upon a comprehensive data set, as compared to previous works that focused on certain detection techniques or a single planetary characteristic. The dataset contained 23 planetary, stellar, and observational parameters obtained from the NASA Exoplanet Archive. The findings showed that the Transit method is biased towards the detection of short-period, low-eccentricity planets, whereas Radial Velocity is suitable for detecting massive planets around larger stars. High-mass and long-period planets are detected by imaging methods. Microlensing is the least biased but underused. Box, Violin and KDE plots show how the biases in detection methods lead to an incomplete picture of exoplanets. Improvement in detection methods is necessary to better understand exoplanets.

Tonbridge School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
SAS software applications and methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.