Comparison of Techniques for Predicting Statistical Distribution of Fields in Chaotic Enclosures

Here we explore a key difference between statistical techniques for estimating electric fields in chaotic, overmoded cavities. The Stochastic Power Balance, the Random Coupling Model, and the Stochastic Green's Function are all based on expanding field parameters in statistical cavity eigenfunctions approximated by a sum over random plane waves where eigenmode spacing is given by random matrix theory. They differ, however, in how they evaluate the statistics of fields over an ensemble. Power balance, initially developed by the acoustics community, first averages the field energy over the cavity and then notes that this average energy varies over an ensemble of such cavities, empirically characterizing this variation with a lognormal distribution. Then, noting that for each value of average cavity energy the field is Rayleigh distributed, they get field statistics from a convolution integral over the two distributions. Both the Random Coupling Model and Stochastic Green's Function calculate the point-to-point coupling for each member of the ensemble and calculate field statistics using a Monte Carlo approach. In this paper we compare the two approaches, finding that for high modal overlap they are identical and differ only modestly at lower modal overlap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/emcsipi52291.2025.11169760
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Techniques for Predicting Statistical Distribution of Fields in Chaotic Enclosures

Paul Bremner, T. W. Hussey, Zhen Peng, Evelyn A Dohme Dhombridge
Computational Physics and Python Applications
article

Comparison of Techniques for Predicting Statistical Distribution of Fields in Chaotic Enclosures

Paul Bremner, T. W. Hussey, Zhen Peng, Evelyn A Dohme Dhombridge
article en

Abstract

Here we explore a key difference between statistical techniques for estimating electric fields in chaotic, overmoded cavities. The Stochastic Power Balance, the Random Coupling Model, and the Stochastic Green's Function are all based on expanding field parameters in statistical cavity eigenfunctions approximated by a sum over random plane waves where eigenmode spacing is given by random matrix theory. They differ, however, in how they evaluate the statistics of fields over an ensemble. Power balance, initially developed by the acoustics community, first averages the field energy over the cavity and then notes that this average energy varies over an ensemble of such cavities, empirically characterizing this variation with a lognormal distribution. Then, noting that for each value of average cavity energy the field is Rayleigh distributed, they get field statistics from a convolution integral over the two distributions. Both the Random Coupling Model and Stochastic Green's Function calculate the point-to-point coupling for each member of the ensemble and calculate field statistics using a Monte Carlo approach. In this paper we compare the two approaches, finding that for high modal overlap they are identical and differ only modestly at lower modal overlap.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of New Mexico (US), Sandia National Laboratories California (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Robust Chip (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Computational Physics and Python Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Techniques for Predicting Statistical Distribution of Fields in Chaotic Enclosures — Paul Bremner, T. W. Hussey, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS