Comparative Assessment of Rf-Induced Heating in Epicardial Implantable Electronic Devices During 0.55 T and 1.5 T Mri: Effects of Full Systems Vs. Abandoned Leads

Majority of young pediatric patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have epicardial leads, creating contraindication for MRI due to concerns about RFinduced heating. This limitation not only denies them access to the superior diagnostic capabilities of MRI but also forces reliance on alternative imaging modalities such as CT and Xray, subjecting young patients to potentially harmful radiation during critical developmental years. While recently introduced low-field MRI scanners (e.g., 0.55 T) are considered more implant-friendly, current claims are based on limited data, and the implant-specific risks remain largely unexplored. In this study, we systematically evaluated the RF heating of a commercial epicardial lead under varying termination conditions during MRI at 0.55 T and compared these results with heating observed at a conventional 1.5 T scanner. Our findings reveal that RF heating of the epicardial lead was significantly lower at 0.55 T across all termination scenarios. Furthermore, leads connected to the implantable pulse generator (IPG) exhibited the highest RF heating, while abandoned leads demonstrated comparatively reduced heating. These results highlight the importance of implant-specific evaluations in assessing MRI safety, particularly at low field strengths, and provide critical insights for optimizing imaging protocols for pediatric CIED patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/emcsipi52291.2025.11170295
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Rf-Induced Heating in Epicardial Implantable Electronic Devices During 0.55 T and 1.5 T Mri: Effects of Full Systems Vs. Abandoned Leads

J. A. Richardson, Gregory Webster, Bhumi Bhusal, Nicole Seiberlich et al.
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Comparative Assessment of Rf-Induced Heating in Epicardial Implantable Electronic Devices During 0.55 T and 1.5 T Mri: Effects of Full Systems Vs. Abandoned Leads

J. A. Richardson, Gregory Webster, Bhumi Bhusal, Nicole Seiberlich, Pia Sanpitak, Laleh Golestanirad, Fuchang Jiang
article en

Abstract

Majority of young pediatric patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have epicardial leads, creating contraindication for MRI due to concerns about RFinduced heating. This limitation not only denies them access to the superior diagnostic capabilities of MRI but also forces reliance on alternative imaging modalities such as CT and Xray, subjecting young patients to potentially harmful radiation during critical developmental years. While recently introduced low-field MRI scanners (e.g., 0.55 T) are considered more implant-friendly, current claims are based on limited data, and the implant-specific risks remain largely unexplored. In this study, we systematically evaluated the RF heating of a commercial epicardial lead under varying termination conditions during MRI at 0.55 T and compared these results with heating observed at a conventional 1.5 T scanner. Our findings reveal that RF heating of the epicardial lead was significantly lower at 0.55 T across all termination scenarios. Furthermore, leads connected to the implantable pulse generator (IPG) exhibited the highest RF heating, while abandoned leads demonstrated comparatively reduced heating. These results highlight the importance of implant-specific evaluations in assessing MRI safety, particularly at low field strengths, and provide critical insights for optimizing imaging protocols for pediatric CIED patients.

Northwestern University (US), University of Michigan (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.