Innovative Hybrid Models for Predicting Diabetes: CNN-LSTM Hybrid and Calibrated Soft Voting Model

This study assesses four ensemble techniques—stacking, soft voting, hard voting, and calibrated soft voting—for predicting diabetes onset using the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset. Traditional single-model methods are contrasted with these advanced ensemble approaches, which integrate multiple models to enhance predictive accuracy. The evaluation included metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC. The CNN-LSTM model was also examined, achieving an accuracy of 75%, precision of 70%, recall of 69%, and an F1 score of 72%. Among the suggested methods, the calibrated soft vote model was the most effective, with improved performance compared to the rest of the techniques. Upcoming studies will address the combination of these models with real-time monitoring systems and deploying their use across a broad range of datasets and medical conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icscsa66339.2025.11170763
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative Hybrid Models for Predicting Diabetes: CNN-LSTM Hybrid and Calibrated Soft Voting Model

Jossy P. George, James E. George
1 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.48
article

Innovative Hybrid Models for Predicting Diabetes: CNN-LSTM Hybrid and Calibrated Soft Voting Model

Jossy P. George, James E. George
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study assesses four ensemble techniques—stacking, soft voting, hard voting, and calibrated soft voting—for predicting diabetes onset using the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset. Traditional single-model methods are contrasted with these advanced ensemble approaches, which integrate multiple models to enhance predictive accuracy. The evaluation included metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC. The CNN-LSTM model was also examined, achieving an accuracy of 75%, precision of 70%, recall of 69%, and an F1 score of 72%. Among the suggested methods, the calibrated soft vote model was the most effective, with improved performance compared to the rest of the techniques. Upcoming studies will address the combination of these models with real-time monitoring systems and deploying their use across a broad range of datasets and medical conditions.

Christ University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.