An options-pricing approach to forecasting the US election
A subjective probability argument suggests vote-share estimates from polls can be interpreted as market prices. The corresponding election constitutes the price at a known future date. This makes an options-pricing approach particularly attractive. The approach works well for proportional systems. Here, we show how to adjust the approach for non-proportional first-past-the-post systems. We illistrate our approach with an application to the most recent 2020 and 2024 elections. • We adapt an options-pricing model of elections to non-proportional systems. • We apply our model to the US presidential election. • Trump starts both 2020 and 2024 campaigns ahead but his lead reduces over time. • In 2020 Biden is ahead from October onwards. • In 2024 Kamala Harris may have benefitted from a longer campaign.
Authors
- John Fry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-0586)
- Thomas Hastings (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-8853)
- Steve Bennett
Institutions
- Stranmillis University College (GB)
- University of Hull (GB)
- Queens University (BD)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Economics Letters
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112632
- Primary Topic
- Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00