Divide, radicalize and conquer: Algorithmic micro-targeting, “Not Like Us” propaganda and fractured resistance

While far-right radicalization narratives rightly focus on white supremacist violence, fixating solely on alienated white men obscures a key facet of digital authoritarianism: the algorithmic weaponization of marginalized groups to spread the anti-Black/xenophobic tropes targeting them. Analyzing Donald Trump’s 2024 “Haitians eating pets” conspiracy and Black influencer Anthony Harris—framed as “algorithmic prey”—reveals how platforms’ microtargeting launders white-supremacist narratives through unexpected vectors, fracturing resistance intracommunally. Tracing tactics from impersonation campaigns (#EndFathersDay) to denigrating stereotypes (e.g. SlaveTok) highlights platforms’ deliberate design (e.g. Meta’s identity-based targeting) funneling vulnerable users. Critiquing inadequate solutions (media literacy and racist/non-racist binaries), effective resistance requires platform accountability (regulating algorithms), rhetorical disarmament, and offline solidarity networks. Harris’s case reveals digital ism's blueprint: exploiting engagement algorithms to ensnare diverse actors, sabotaging resistance from within.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251381450
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divide, radicalize and conquer: Algorithmic micro-targeting, “Not Like Us” propaganda and fractured resistance

Brooklyne Gipson
Dialogues on Digital Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Divide, radicalize and conquer: Algorithmic micro-targeting, “Not Like Us” propaganda and fractured resistance

Brooklyne Gipson
article en

Abstract

While far-right radicalization narratives rightly focus on white supremacist violence, fixating solely on alienated white men obscures a key facet of digital authoritarianism: the algorithmic weaponization of marginalized groups to spread the anti-Black/xenophobic tropes targeting them. Analyzing Donald Trump’s 2024 “Haitians eating pets” conspiracy and Black influencer Anthony Harris—framed as “algorithmic prey”—reveals how platforms’ microtargeting launders white-supremacist narratives through unexpected vectors, fracturing resistance intracommunally. Tracing tactics from impersonation campaigns (#EndFathersDay) to denigrating stereotypes (e.g. SlaveTok) highlights platforms’ deliberate design (e.g. Meta’s identity-based targeting) funneling vulnerable users. Critiquing inadequate solutions (media literacy and racist/non-racist binaries), effective resistance requires platform accountability (regulating algorithms), rhetorical disarmament, and offline solidarity networks. Harris’s case reveals digital ism's blueprint: exploiting engagement algorithms to ensnare diverse actors, sabotaging resistance from within.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(3)
Danish School of Media and Journalism (DK), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Divide, radicalize and conquer: Algorithmic micro-targeting, “Not Like Us” propaganda and fractured resistance — Brooklyne Gipson · Dialogues on Digital Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS