Predicting Tensile Strength in FDM-Printed PLA Parts Using Machine Learning

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is transforming the manufacturing industry, with Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) being one of the most widely used techniques due to its affordability and ease of use. However, the mechanical performance of FDM-printed parts is highly dependent on process parameters, making it essential to understand and optimize their influence. This study investigates the impact of six critical FDM parameters including extruder temperature, printing speed, infill density, infill pattern, layer height, and the number of wall layers, on the tensile strength of 3D-printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) parts. Using the dataset from Qian et al. (2024), which includes tensile strength values of 92 PLA samples fabricated under varied parameter settings, we extend their work by applying several machine learning (ML) models to predict and classify mechanical outcomes. Regression algorithms used include Polynomial Regression (PR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), while classification tasks employed Support Vector Classifier (SVC) and XGBoost (XGB). The XGBoost regressor outperformed other models with a test R² of 0.76 (RMSE:5.19, MAE:3.09), followed by Polynomial Regression (R²:0.71, RMSE:5.60, MAE:3.17), Gradient Boosting (R²:0.70, RMSE:5.78, MAE:2.83), and SVM (R²:0.65, RMSE:6.18, MAE:3.19). In classification, the XGB classifier achieved perfect results on the test set with 100% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, whereas the SVC model attained an accuracy of 84.21% and an F1-score of 0.8491. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis revealed infill density, printing speed and wall layers as the most influential parameters (p

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46254/na10.20250293
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Tensile Strength in FDM-Printed PLA Parts Using Machine Learning

Ashiqur Rahman Khan, Lin Guo, Mehrab Karim, Suhao Chen et al.
1 citations
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
article

Predicting Tensile Strength in FDM-Printed PLA Parts Using Machine Learning

Ashiqur Rahman Khan, Lin Guo, Mehrab Karim, Suhao Chen, Anik Roy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is transforming the manufacturing industry, with Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) being one of the most widely used techniques due to its affordability and ease of use. However, the mechanical performance of FDM-printed parts is highly dependent on process parameters, making it essential to understand and optimize their influence. This study investigates the impact of six critical FDM parameters including extruder temperature, printing speed, infill density, infill pattern, layer height, and the number of wall layers, on the tensile strength of 3D-printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) parts. Using the dataset from Qian et al. (2024), which includes tensile strength values of 92 PLA samples fabricated under varied parameter settings, we extend their work by applying several machine learning (ML) models to predict and classify mechanical outcomes. Regression algorithms used include Polynomial Regression (PR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), while classification tasks employed Support Vector Classifier (SVC) and XGBoost (XGB). The XGBoost regressor outperformed other models with a test R² of 0.76 (RMSE:5.19, MAE:3.09), followed by Polynomial Regression (R²:0.71, RMSE:5.60, MAE:3.17), Gradient Boosting (R²:0.70, RMSE:5.78, MAE:2.83), and SVM (R²:0.65, RMSE:6.18, MAE:3.19). In classification, the XGB classifier achieved perfect results on the test set with 100% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, whereas the SVC model attained an accuracy of 84.21% and an F1-score of 0.8491. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis revealed infill density, printing speed and wall layers as the most influential parameters (p

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD), South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US), Ohio University (US), Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology (BD), University of Military Science and Technology (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.