Systematic Review of AI and Non-AI Approaches for Personalized Learning Paths

Personalized learning paths (PLPs) have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance student outcomes. These paths tailor educational content, pace, and assessment methods to meet individual student needs and learning styles, promoting deeper engagement and better knowledge retention. In this paper, we survey and analyze existing solutions, both AI-driven and non-AI approaches. AI-based methods leverage techniques such as machine learning, natural language processing, and recommender systems to dynamically adapt learning experiences. At the same time, non-AI solutions rely on rule-based systems, instructor-driven customizations, and predefined learning sequences. By comparing these approaches, we highlight their strengths, limitations, and applicability in the university STEM context. Our analysis aims to provide researchers, educators, and policymakers with insights into the current landscape of personalized learning path development and guide future research directions for integrating AI responsibly and effectively in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46254/na10.20250127
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Review of AI and Non-AI Approaches for Personalized Learning Paths

Ayesha S. Dina, Luis G. Jaimes, Bismack Tokoli
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Systematic Review of AI and Non-AI Approaches for Personalized Learning Paths

Ayesha S. Dina, Luis G. Jaimes, Bismack Tokoli
article en

Abstract

Personalized learning paths (PLPs) have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance student outcomes. These paths tailor educational content, pace, and assessment methods to meet individual student needs and learning styles, promoting deeper engagement and better knowledge retention. In this paper, we survey and analyze existing solutions, both AI-driven and non-AI approaches. AI-based methods leverage techniques such as machine learning, natural language processing, and recommender systems to dynamically adapt learning experiences. At the same time, non-AI solutions rely on rule-based systems, instructor-driven customizations, and predefined learning sequences. By comparing these approaches, we highlight their strengths, limitations, and applicability in the university STEM context. Our analysis aims to provide researchers, educators, and policymakers with insights into the current landscape of personalized learning path development and guide future research directions for integrating AI responsibly and effectively in higher education.

Florida Polytechnic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.