El lenguaje como contexto de lo psicológico:  función versus morfología en el estudio del comportamiento lingüístico

This article points out that, among the diverse approaches in the psychology of language, the most suggestive trend is the behavioral current, because it conceives language as the context of the psychological. This expression draws on Wittgenstein's concept of the "form of life" applied to language, in the sense that it approaches it as an encompassing conventional framework that gives meaning to human behavior. This perspective goes beyond the mere formal-morphological analysis that has characterized most psycholinguistic and constructivist approaches, focusing instead on the function of verbal-symbolic exchanges between individuals. From this point of view, the proposals of J. R. Kantor and B. F. Skinner, as well as the contributions of their followers (Ribes' interbehaviorism and Hayes' relational frame theory), are deemed the most appropriate. This assertion is justified in philosophical, theoretical, methodological, and technological terms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orkopata Revista de Lingüística Literatura y Arte
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35622/j.ro.2025.01.001
Primary Topic
Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

El lenguaje como contexto de lo psicológico:  función versus morfología en el estudio del comportamiento lingüístico

William Montgomery Urday
Orkopata Revista de Lingüística Literatura y Arte
Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
article

El lenguaje como contexto de lo psicológico:  función versus morfología en el estudio del comportamiento lingüístico

William Montgomery Urday
article en

Abstract

This article points out that, among the diverse approaches in the psychology of language, the most suggestive trend is the behavioral current, because it conceives language as the context of the psychological. This expression draws on Wittgenstein's concept of the "form of life" applied to language, in the sense that it approaches it as an encompassing conventional framework that gives meaning to human behavior. This perspective goes beyond the mere formal-morphological analysis that has characterized most psycholinguistic and constructivist approaches, focusing instead on the function of verbal-symbolic exchanges between individuals. From this point of view, the proposals of J. R. Kantor and B. F. Skinner, as well as the contributions of their followers (Ribes' interbehaviorism and Hayes' relational frame theory), are deemed the most appropriate. This assertion is justified in philosophical, theoretical, methodological, and technological terms.

Orkopata Revista de Lingüística Literatura y ArteVol. 4(1)
National University of San Marcos (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.