Comparative Analysis of the Thulium Fiber Laser, Holmium: YAG Laser, and Pneumatic Lithotripter in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Background Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) has become a standard treatment for moderate-sized renal calculi. Among intracorporeal lithotripters, the thulium fiber laser (TFL), Holmium: YAG laser, and pneumatic devices remain the most widely used, yet direct comparative evidence in mini-PCNL remains limited. Aim The aim of this study is to compare the intraoperative efficiency, perioperative outcomes, and long-term sequelae of TFL, Holmium: YAG, and pneumatic lithotripters in mini-PCNL. Materials and methods A comparative study was conducted in 221 patients undergoing mini-PCNL for 10-30 mm renal stones. Patients were allocated to TFL (n=79), Holmium: YAG (n=72), or pneumatic lithotripter (n=70) groups. Demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative parameters, perioperative complications, and 12-month outcomes were analyzed. Statistical comparisons included ANOVA and chi-square tests, with significance set at p<0.05. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. Stone disintegration time was significantly shorter in the TFL group (24.17 ± 4.7 min) than Holmium (31.45 ± 6.3) and pneumatic groups (35.26 ± 5.9) (p<0.01). Mean operative time was lowest with TFL (53 ± 9.8 min) versus Holmium (71 ± 14.6) and pneumatic (83 ± 12.8) (p<0.001) groups. In laser groups, energy usage per case was markedly lower with TFL (15.95 kJ) compared to Holmium (23.59 kJ) (p<0.01). Stone-free rate (SFR) was highest with TFL (94.8%), followed by Holmium (84%) and pneumatic (79%) (p=0.02) groups. TFL also showed the lowest hemoglobin drop (0.44 g/dL) and hematocrit change (3.2%, both p<0.05). Complication rates by Clavien-Dindo classification were similar, though hematuria and sepsis were more frequent in the pneumatic group. At 12 months, infundibular stenosis was detected in six TFL, four Holmium, and two pneumatic patients (p=0.18). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward higher stenosis with TFL. Conclusion TFL offers superior intraoperative efficiency, reduced energy usage, and a higher SFR in mini-PCNL. However, the potential for increased long-term stenosis requires further evaluation. Clinicians should weigh immediate benefits against possible delayed sequelae when selecting the lithotripter modality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93209
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Thulium Fiber Laser, Holmium: YAG Laser, and Pneumatic Lithotripter in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Madan Gopal Bhardwaj, Sameer Trivedi, Ujwal Kumar, Anil Baliyan et al.
Cureus
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Comparative Analysis of the Thulium Fiber Laser, Holmium: YAG Laser, and Pneumatic Lithotripter in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Madan Gopal Bhardwaj, Sameer Trivedi, Ujwal Kumar, Anil Baliyan, Lalit Kumar, Aviral Srivastava, Yashasvi Singh, Sahil Data, Narayan Shubham
article en

Abstract

Background Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) has become a standard treatment for moderate-sized renal calculi. Among intracorporeal lithotripters, the thulium fiber laser (TFL), Holmium: YAG laser, and pneumatic devices remain the most widely used, yet direct comparative evidence in mini-PCNL remains limited. Aim The aim of this study is to compare the intraoperative efficiency, perioperative outcomes, and long-term sequelae of TFL, Holmium: YAG, and pneumatic lithotripters in mini-PCNL. Materials and methods A comparative study was conducted in 221 patients undergoing mini-PCNL for 10-30 mm renal stones. Patients were allocated to TFL (n=79), Holmium: YAG (n=72), or pneumatic lithotripter (n=70) groups. Demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative parameters, perioperative complications, and 12-month outcomes were analyzed. Statistical comparisons included ANOVA and chi-square tests, with significance set at p<0.05. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. Stone disintegration time was significantly shorter in the TFL group (24.17 ± 4.7 min) than Holmium (31.45 ± 6.3) and pneumatic groups (35.26 ± 5.9) (p<0.01). Mean operative time was lowest with TFL (53 ± 9.8 min) versus Holmium (71 ± 14.6) and pneumatic (83 ± 12.8) (p<0.001) groups. In laser groups, energy usage per case was markedly lower with TFL (15.95 kJ) compared to Holmium (23.59 kJ) (p<0.01). Stone-free rate (SFR) was highest with TFL (94.8%), followed by Holmium (84%) and pneumatic (79%) (p=0.02) groups. TFL also showed the lowest hemoglobin drop (0.44 g/dL) and hematocrit change (3.2%, both p<0.05). Complication rates by Clavien-Dindo classification were similar, though hematuria and sepsis were more frequent in the pneumatic group. At 12 months, infundibular stenosis was detected in six TFL, four Holmium, and two pneumatic patients (p=0.18). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward higher stenosis with TFL. Conclusion TFL offers superior intraoperative efficiency, reduced energy usage, and a higher SFR in mini-PCNL. However, the potential for increased long-term stenosis requires further evaluation. Clinicians should weigh immediate benefits against possible delayed sequelae when selecting the lithotripter modality.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.