Mapping forty years of smart environments for older people research: A scientometric review

As global ageing accelerates, built environments struggle to meet living requirements of older adults. Smart environments, leveraging Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT), support independent living, yet research remains predominantly technology-oriented, with insufficient integration of spatial planning and inclusive design. This gap limits technological implementation in daily life and neglects seniors' lived experiences. Utilising scientometric analysis of 6371 publications (1983–2024), this paper investigates evolution, current trends, thematic shifts, and gaps in research on Smart Environments For Old People (SEFOP). The findings indicate: (a) SEFOP research has consistently expanded in an uneven manner across thematic areas; (b) five dominant clusters—Quality of Life and Health Management, Smart City and Intelligent Systems, Smart Home and IoT, Intelligent Buildings and Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) and Assisted Living and AI—are identified, exhibiting asynchronous evolution and shifting importance over time; (c) Current smart systems remain misaligned with environmental design, revealing a technology–space disconnect; (d) Evidence on Smart Precinct Design and social inclusion remains scarce, despite its importance for age-friendly cities; (e) A four-dimensional framework—linking time, technology, spatial typologies, and research goals—is proposed to advance more inclusive smart ageing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106505
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping forty years of smart environments for older people research: A scientometric review

Kirsty Volz, Bo Xia, Yu‐Tang Gao, Mirko Guaralda
Cities
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
article

Mapping forty years of smart environments for older people research: A scientometric review

Kirsty Volz, Bo Xia, Yu‐Tang Gao, Mirko Guaralda
article en

Abstract

As global ageing accelerates, built environments struggle to meet living requirements of older adults. Smart environments, leveraging Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT), support independent living, yet research remains predominantly technology-oriented, with insufficient integration of spatial planning and inclusive design. This gap limits technological implementation in daily life and neglects seniors' lived experiences. Utilising scientometric analysis of 6371 publications (1983–2024), this paper investigates evolution, current trends, thematic shifts, and gaps in research on Smart Environments For Old People (SEFOP). The findings indicate: (a) SEFOP research has consistently expanded in an uneven manner across thematic areas; (b) five dominant clusters—Quality of Life and Health Management, Smart City and Intelligent Systems, Smart Home and IoT, Intelligent Buildings and Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) and Assisted Living and AI—are identified, exhibiting asynchronous evolution and shifting importance over time; (c) Current smart systems remain misaligned with environmental design, revealing a technology–space disconnect; (d) Evidence on Smart Precinct Design and social inclusion remains scarce, despite its importance for age-friendly cities; (e) A four-dimensional framework—linking time, technology, spatial typologies, and research goals—is proposed to advance more inclusive smart ageing strategies.

CitiesVol. 168
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Guangzhou University (CN), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.