States and corporate land acquisition: comparing regimes of dispossession across the global south

How do processes of land dispossession vary across countries and sectors, and how could these differences be studied comparatively? In this introductory essay to the special issue Comparing Regimes of Dispossession, we address these questions by analysing a range of cases of corporate land dispossession from Brazil, East Timor, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Cambodia. We compare these cases by analysing five aspects of dispossessionary processes: actors, legal mechanisms, degree of regulatory evasion, coercion and remuneration. Building on this framework, we argue that these dimensions align in ways that reveal three distinct forms that processes of land dispossession may take: eminent domain-based, curtailed land rights-based, and decentralized coercion-based dispossession. We propose that a comparative approach is crucial for understanding the conditions that facilitate land dispossession, as well as the opportunities for affected communities to effectively resist the corporate acquisition of their land.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2025.2555139
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

States and corporate land acquisition: comparing regimes of dispossession across the global south

Neil Loughlin, Ward Berenschot
1 citations
Globalizations
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
article

States and corporate land acquisition: comparing regimes of dispossession across the global south

Neil Loughlin, Ward Berenschot
article en
1 citations

Abstract

How do processes of land dispossession vary across countries and sectors, and how could these differences be studied comparatively? In this introductory essay to the special issue Comparing Regimes of Dispossession, we address these questions by analysing a range of cases of corporate land dispossession from Brazil, East Timor, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Cambodia. We compare these cases by analysing five aspects of dispossessionary processes: actors, legal mechanisms, degree of regulatory evasion, coercion and remuneration. Building on this framework, we argue that these dimensions align in ways that reveal three distinct forms that processes of land dispossession may take: eminent domain-based, curtailed land rights-based, and decentralized coercion-based dispossession. We propose that a comparative approach is crucial for understanding the conditions that facilitate land dispossession, as well as the opportunities for affected communities to effectively resist the corporate acquisition of their land.

GlobalizationsVol. 22(8)
St George's, University of London (GB), Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies (NL), City St George's, University of London (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.