Analysis of configurations for coupling an active magnetic regenerator with heat exchangers for hydrogen liquefaction

This paper presents a study of four different configurations for performing the heat exchange between helium—supplied by an active magnetic regenerator (AMR)—and hydrogen in the 82–20 K range for hydrogen liquefaction. We evaluate helium mass flow requirements and analyse the configurations considering both technical and exergetic aspects. Results show a strong influence of the temperature difference of helium at the AMR cold end on the required helium mass flow rate, which ranges from 35 to over 75 times the liquid hydrogen mass flow rate. The exergy efficiency of the cooling stage, not including AMR losses, ranges between 33 % and 49 %. The use of a single AMR causes significant temperature differences between helium and hydrogen in the heat exchangers leading to large exergy losses (representing over 95 % of the overall losses). We finally show that this issue can be overcome using multiple AMR in parallel with increasing cold-end temperatures. • Comparison of configurations for He-H 2 heat exchange in H 2 liquefaction systems • Great influence of adiabatic temperature difference on He-to-LH 2 mass flow ratio • Exergy efficiency for the cooling stage between 33 % and 49 % • Higher exergy efficiency requires larger heat transfer surfaces • Heat exchangers account for over 95 % of total exergy losses, excluding AMR losses

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel Processing Technology
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108337
Primary Topic
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of configurations for coupling an active magnetic regenerator with heat exchangers for hydrogen liquefaction

Angelica Liponi, Umberto Desideri, Rasmus Bjørk, Mathieu Tenda
Fuel Processing Technology
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
article

Analysis of configurations for coupling an active magnetic regenerator with heat exchangers for hydrogen liquefaction

Angelica Liponi, Umberto Desideri, Rasmus Bjørk, Mathieu Tenda
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a study of four different configurations for performing the heat exchange between helium—supplied by an active magnetic regenerator (AMR)—and hydrogen in the 82–20 K range for hydrogen liquefaction. We evaluate helium mass flow requirements and analyse the configurations considering both technical and exergetic aspects. Results show a strong influence of the temperature difference of helium at the AMR cold end on the required helium mass flow rate, which ranges from 35 to over 75 times the liquid hydrogen mass flow rate. The exergy efficiency of the cooling stage, not including AMR losses, ranges between 33 % and 49 %. The use of a single AMR causes significant temperature differences between helium and hydrogen in the heat exchangers leading to large exergy losses (representing over 95 % of the overall losses). We finally show that this issue can be overcome using multiple AMR in parallel with increasing cold-end temperatures. • Comparison of configurations for He-H 2 heat exchange in H 2 liquefaction systems • Great influence of adiabatic temperature difference on He-to-LH 2 mass flow ratio • Exergy efficiency for the cooling stage between 33 % and 49 % • Higher exergy efficiency requires larger heat transfer surfaces • Heat exchangers account for over 95 % of total exergy losses, excluding AMR losses

Fuel Processing TechnologyVol. 278
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.