Environmental advantages of green-labelled navel oranges in China: A supply chain perspective

Quantifying the environmental performance (EP) of citrus supply chains (SCs) via life cycle assessment is important for optimising fruit production for sufficient vitamin and micronutrient provision at lower environmental costs. As a part of national programme in China, green-labelled navel oranges use up to 50.0% less chemical nitrogen fertilisers and become increasingly popular for their high quality. However, their EP remain unclear from the full SC perspective, and critical indicators, e.g. ecotoxicity and land occupation potential (LOP), have been mostly neglected in previous studies. Based on interviews with orange SC (OSC) stakeholders, this study analyses eleven ReCiPe2016 (H) midpoint indicators and normalises characterised results, followed by Monte Carlo simulation, to compare the EP of conventional, green-labelled, and organic-labelled OSCs from production to consumption. Green-labelled OSCs show lower impacts across most categories. Specifically, they reduce the LOP by 72.6% compared with organic-labelled OSCs and decrease the ozone depletion potential by 65.5% relative to conventional OSCs. Their total environmental index is 31.4% and 24.5% lower than conventional and organic-labelled OSCs, respectively. Packaging, transport, and production are significant contributing stages. Key contributing inputs include nitrogen fertiliser, corrugated boxes, long-distance transport, and land use. Beyond well-recognised fossil fuel potential, terrestrial ecotoxicity potential and LOP are newly identified critical indicators for OSC evaluation. Thus, green-labelled OSCs represent a more environment-friendly model for high-yield and high-quality fruit supply. This multi-stage and multi-indicator approach offers a transferable framework for comprehensive evaluation and optimisation of fruit SCs towards sustainable fruit provision and environment management. • Green-labelled OSCs have the least total environmental index. • Key contributors include production, packaging, and transport. • TETP and LOP are newly identified critical indicators. • Optimising yield, inputs, and transport can improve OSC environmental performance. • It provides a multi-stage and -indicator LCA framework for other FSCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100273
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental advantages of green-labelled navel oranges in China: A supply chain perspective

Minghao Zhuang, Xuexian Li, Xiang Zhang, Junhan Zhang et al.
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Environmental advantages of green-labelled navel oranges in China: A supply chain perspective

Minghao Zhuang, Xuexian Li, Xiang Zhang, Junhan Zhang, P.M. Slegers, Zhihua Zhang, Ruijin Luo, G.D.H. Claassen
article en

Abstract

Quantifying the environmental performance (EP) of citrus supply chains (SCs) via life cycle assessment is important for optimising fruit production for sufficient vitamin and micronutrient provision at lower environmental costs. As a part of national programme in China, green-labelled navel oranges use up to 50.0% less chemical nitrogen fertilisers and become increasingly popular for their high quality. However, their EP remain unclear from the full SC perspective, and critical indicators, e.g. ecotoxicity and land occupation potential (LOP), have been mostly neglected in previous studies. Based on interviews with orange SC (OSC) stakeholders, this study analyses eleven ReCiPe2016 (H) midpoint indicators and normalises characterised results, followed by Monte Carlo simulation, to compare the EP of conventional, green-labelled, and organic-labelled OSCs from production to consumption. Green-labelled OSCs show lower impacts across most categories. Specifically, they reduce the LOP by 72.6% compared with organic-labelled OSCs and decrease the ozone depletion potential by 65.5% relative to conventional OSCs. Their total environmental index is 31.4% and 24.5% lower than conventional and organic-labelled OSCs, respectively. Packaging, transport, and production are significant contributing stages. Key contributing inputs include nitrogen fertiliser, corrugated boxes, long-distance transport, and land use. Beyond well-recognised fossil fuel potential, terrestrial ecotoxicity potential and LOP are newly identified critical indicators for OSC evaluation. Thus, green-labelled OSCs represent a more environment-friendly model for high-yield and high-quality fruit supply. This multi-stage and multi-indicator approach offers a transferable framework for comprehensive evaluation and optimisation of fruit SCs towards sustainable fruit provision and environment management. • Green-labelled OSCs have the least total environmental index. • Key contributors include production, packaging, and transport. • TETP and LOP are newly identified critical indicators. • Optimising yield, inputs, and transport can improve OSC environmental performance. • It provides a multi-stage and -indicator LCA framework for other FSCs.

Resources Environment and SustainabilityVol. 22
Beijing Academy of Food Sciences (CN), China Agricultural University (CN), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.