Floating offshore wind on the U.S. West Coast: an expert elicitation

Abstract California has ambitious offshore wind goals of 2–5 GW by 2030 and 25 GW by 2045. The coastline deep ocean floor calls for floating offshore wind (FOSW), a new technology whose application has yet to be built to scale. Given the novelty, deep uncertainty, and lack of data regarding FOSW, we fielded an expert elicitation regarding the costs, probability and duration of failure, and likely potential system architectures. We find that there is significant disagreement among experts: cost estimates vary by a factor of at least 3. Probabilities of failure range from 0.01% to 20% for most parts of the system. Experts diverged on likely transmission configurations that are likely to be used with FOSW projects, though most agreed DC technologies will be used in the future. Overall, experts believe California’s 2030 FOSW targets will not be met but could be achieved by 2035, and 2045 targets could be realized with faster buildout of future lease areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae0b94
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Floating offshore wind on the U.S. West Coast: an expert elicitation

Inês L. Azevedo, Nils Angliviel de La Beaumelle, Ekundayo Shittu, Kamran Tehranchi et al.
2 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
2.29
article

Floating offshore wind on the U.S. West Coast: an expert elicitation

Inês L. Azevedo, Nils Angliviel de La Beaumelle, Ekundayo Shittu, Kamran Tehranchi, Matteo Simoncini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract California has ambitious offshore wind goals of 2–5 GW by 2030 and 25 GW by 2045. The coastline deep ocean floor calls for floating offshore wind (FOSW), a new technology whose application has yet to be built to scale. Given the novelty, deep uncertainty, and lack of data regarding FOSW, we fielded an expert elicitation regarding the costs, probability and duration of failure, and likely potential system architectures. We find that there is significant disagreement among experts: cost estimates vary by a factor of at least 3. Probabilities of failure range from 0.01% to 20% for most parts of the system. Experts diverged on likely transmission configurations that are likely to be used with FOSW projects, though most agreed DC technologies will be used in the future. Overall, experts believe California’s 2030 FOSW targets will not be met but could be achieved by 2035, and 2045 targets could be realized with faster buildout of future lease areas.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(11)
George Washington University (US), Cardiovascular Institute of the South (US), Environmental and Water Resources Engineering (IL), Terna (Italy) (IT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Floating offshore wind on the U.S. West Coast: an expert elicitation — Inês L. Azevedo, Nils Angliviel de La Beaumelle, et al. · Environmental Research Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS