<scp>ISUOG</scp> Consensus Statement on maternal hemodynamic assessment in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal growth restriction

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) is a scientific organization that encourages sound clinical practice, and high-quality teaching and research, related to diagnostic imaging in women's healthcare. The ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee (CSC) has the remit to develop Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements as educational recommendations that provide healthcare practitioners with a consensus-based approach, from experts, for diagnostic imaging. They are intended to reflect what is considered by ISUOG to be the best practice at the time at which they are issued. Although ISUOG has made every effort to ensure that Guidelines and Consensus Statements are accurate when issued, neither the Society nor any of its employees or members accepts any liability for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements issued by the CSC. The ISUOG CSC documents are not intended to establish a legal standard of care because interpretation of the evidence that underpins them may be influenced by individual circumstances, local protocol and available resources. Approved Guidelines and Consensus Statements can be distributed freely with the permission of ISUOG ([email protected]). Pregnancy presents a unique cardiovascular challenge. Profound maternal hemodynamic adjustments result from a complex interplay between the maternal cardiovascular system and uteroplacental perfusion, which permits fetal development while maintaining healthy maternal homeostasis1-5. Failure to meet this challenge can lead to maternal hypertensive complications (hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP)) and/or fetal growth disorders (fetal growth restriction (FGR))6-9. Monitoring and management of HDP and FGR has been based largely on maternal blood pressure (BP) monitoring and fetal growth assessment10. Promising research offers the prospect of a less reactive and more proactive approach. Maladaptation to the requirements of pregnancy can be detected in a preclinical phase of HDP and FGR by maternal hemodynamic assessment, offering opportunities for targeted hemodynamic interventions11-15. Pregnancy also serves as a stress test for future cardiovascular health, especially if superimposed upon subclinical cardiometabolic or cardiovascular vulnerabilities11, 16-19. This Consensus Statement provides an update on the role of maternal hemodynamic assessment in HDP and FGR. A proposal for this Consensus Statement was submitted to and evaluated by the ISUOG CSC. The authors of this Consensus are members of the International Working Group on Maternal Hemodynamics (https://maternalhemodynamics.com/) and were involved in both the development and the writing stages. Members of the International Working Group on Maternal Hemodynamics who were not involved in the writing of this Consensus were invited to review the document (reviewing group) and those who responded are acknowledged. Stakeholders were not included in the writing process. This process was not intended to represent a systematic review. The preselected topics were divided among the authors, who worked in pairs and performed a literature search. T.S. collated the document and proposed the key points. The final document and key points were revised by all authors. Several meetings were organized to discuss any points on which there was not initial consensus, until complete agreement was reached. The document was then finalized after comments from the reviewing group, the ISUOG CSC and the ISUOG Board of Trustees. The authors of this Consensus Statement are experts in the field of maternal hemodynamics and have expressed their opinion based on the available literature and evidence. Any clinician applying this Consensus is expected to use their independent medical judgement in the context of the individual clinical circumstances to determine patient care. Traditionally, peripheral BP is measured by auscultation using an arm cuff connected to a manometer. Increasingly, automated oscillometric devices, validated for pregnancy, are becoming the recommended standard20, 21. Further developments have allowed additional analysis of the arterial waveform for estimation of central BP and arterial function. Markers of arterial stiffness and compliance, such as pulsed-wave velocity and the augmentation index (AIx)22, 23, help to understand the pathophysiology behind HDP and FGR, predict cardiovascular complications, and evaluate and direct prevention and treatment24-26. Assessment of central hemodynamic factors that determine BP (cardiac output (CO, in L/min) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR, in dyne.s/cm5)) is increasingly accessible using easily operable devices27. Considering the pivotal role of central hemodynamic functioning, this Consensus Statement focuses primarily on CO assessment. CO is the product of stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) (CO = SV × HR). Accuracy of its evaluation is improved by averaging measurements over several heartbeats3-5, to compensate for respiratory variations. After 20 gestational weeks, CO is best evaluated with the woman in a left lateral position, to minimize caval and aortic compression by the gravid uterus28, 29. The heart can rapidly modulate CO in order to meet the demands of pregnancy, with a wide range of normality (4–20 L/min) depending on activity level, age, fitness, body size, gestational age and metabolic rate. While trimester-specific reference ranges exist, device-specific normalization, that takes into account maternal age and posture, does not. Indexing for actual or prepregnancy body surface area or height may be of additional value when comparing measurements between individuals27, 30-32. Individual or separate CO measurements can be of value for instant hemodynamic assessment, while repeated or continuous measurements are appropriate for trend analysis. With knowledge of CO and BP, SVR can be calculated ((SVR = 80 × (MAP − RAP)/CO) in dyne.s/cm5), where MAP represents mean arterial pressure and RAP is right atrial pressure. RAP (or central venous pressure) is usually low in pregnancy (0–5 mmHg) and therefore is usually omitted from the calculation33, 34. Arterial function can also be evaluated by Doppler assessment of peripheral vessels, for example the uterine and/or opthalmic arteries. CO is determined most accurately by invasive measurements using thermodilution or indicator (lithium) dilution, or by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The former require insertion of intracardiac, central venous and/or arterial catheters (e.g. pulmonary artery catheters), limiting their indication to critically ill pregnant women in an intensive care unit setting33, 34 . Cardiac MRI is non-invasive, but its limited availability and high cost restrict its use in an obstetric context28, 35. Transthoracic echocardiography permits non-invasive assessment of CO by measuring the left ventricular outflow tract diameter and pulsed-wave Doppler outflow signal along with HR. It has been validated against invasive measurements in severely ill pregnant women and can be considered an alternative reference technique36, 37. Transthoracic echocardiography enables evaluation of systolic and/or diastolic function (assessing ejection fraction using two-dimensional and/or M-mode imaging, strain and strain rate using speckle tracking, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and mitral inflow using pulse-wave and tissue Doppler imaging) and preload assessment (atrial size and inferior vena cava size and collapsibility)38-40. Another means of assessing CO is with a non-invasive mobile device, using a continuous-wave Doppler transducer placed in the suprasternal notch40. This technique is limited by assumptions regarding the left ventricular outflow tract diameter and acoustic guidance for probe orientation. However, by including more heartbeats in the calculation, the accuracy is enhanced. An inert gas rebreathing technique can be used to calculate CO based on Fick's principle41. A blood-soluble and an insoluble gas are delivered though a closed breathing assembly and relative levels over a few respiratory cycles are measured by a gas analyzer in the mouthpiece. As with pulmonary artery catheters, pulmonary blood flow or right ventricular output is measured, which is usually identical to left ventricular output. this technique is more for research clinical With and a is between on the CO can be by in or phase by blood flow the cardiac analysis CO from a peripheral arterial which can be or and and are and continuous monitoring for trend but their to calculate CO are based on assumptions that may non-invasive in pregnancy against reference The few that have been with reference the for and trend CO with technique are not with those using and the be used be to the from devices, as their permits the of of hemodynamic using a in the patient the between and the of over As may be for monitoring as pregnancy pregnancy, the body cardiovascular to hemodynamic to to the metabolic and demands from the and and to the for blood understand the role of maternal hemodynamics in is to understand in healthy pregnancy, as maternal hemodynamic is a for development of a Maternal hemodynamic can be the to the the the volume CO and central and peripheral arterial are while the MAP and SVR are are in pregnancy, from of to the development of a The maternal hemodynamic in pregnancy is that a in by to as the most to vascular to a in MAP and a in The initial in CO is by an in are by to in flow and rate and in The result of is and with and The preload to improved cardiac with cardiac this in SV in As a result of the maternal heart the left atrial left ventricular diastolic and systolic and ventricular all in cardiac surface area and Maternal cardiac at of but at of The of CO is also by cardiac which is by the in while the pressure is with arterial venous a of to preload and of A of is the of this but has been that including and by the and factors (e.g. vascular a role in maternal hemodynamic in which mean that the maternal hemodynamic in pregnancy develop from the After the healthy pregnancy is by hemodynamic including in CO and in SVR and and in maternal cardiac function. cardiac preload and result in SV and CO in the of SV by in pregnancy and by 20 the of pregnancy, the in SV is that there is between pregnant and The CO is also by the maternal which by in pregnancy and to until The CO by and by to pregnancy, a mean of between and of It as to CO until or in in between can be by in their and/or and CO to prepregnancy from to in pregnancy, the and the to levels after of the is in the arterial while are in the venous and represent a SVR with an in and in the MAP pregnancy until of because the in CO is not to the in systolic and diastolic BP the in diastolic BP is that in central and systolic is also a in arterial which the central systolic systolic BP systolic BP the uterine artery which to the uteroplacental The BP to levels the preload and have a on maternal cardiac function in the of The in left ventricular diastolic function in the to be determined by an of left ventricular left ventricular diastolic function to as by a to in the and pregnancy, The left ventricular by healthy pregnancy represents a and that has usually by maternal hemodynamic have been in with including CO and SVR The of blood volume and the of such as and are to in maternal systolic and diastolic function have been from the to the diastolic and mean BP a trend their at on left ventricular systolic expressed by fraction or or by tissue Doppler by velocity relative diastolic is as by a in the mitral and an in the with of the tissue Doppler in and in that the maternal heart is to adjustments the of a of there are cardiovascular The of ventricular may on the volume in the of may lead to in the with the diastolic phase and atrial to left ventricular the the of an pregnancy at the of the maternal heart may diastolic as in the of cardiac It is that of diastolic have been at echocardiography in women who or in a maternal the left ventricular is in with but there are in systolic and diastolic left ventricular The of cardiac is between and cardiovascular those in in and in to the in volume of the maternal cardiovascular in maternal cardiac function in from to pregnancy, an in CO and a in It is cardiac with to maternal CO in because of the in the blood a CO in the in to cardiac the of pregnancy after with the of of systolic such as ejection fraction and tissue Doppler which have been to those in the This may that the to the maternal heart by the may the ventricular in the and that complete is The of was based on the of clinical or after 34 of a more with of maternal or with fetal growth that the development of maternal in with of and The maternal hemodynamic are between the both in the and in the phase of the A system has been proposed that is based on maternal hemodynamics and fetal with FGR is by low CO and high in both preclinical and of the with fetal growth is not by low while the SVR in the preclinical phase of the is low and may in the This between by and the by As the of BP as the product of CO and SVR is is the result of CO or The that the is the of is by the of subclinical hemodynamic function in the in women who An of and that the process with is a result a maternal hemodynamic hemodynamic function not to gestational complications, but also to cardiovascular in hemodynamics may be a direct between fetal growth and cardiovascular and While maternal cardiovascular a role in the development of not the of which is when in The between maternal hemodynamics and the system be a of future The of into or the hemodynamic from pregnancy until in women who develop all a hemodynamic between CO and SVR was at all of pregnancy in women who presents with SVR and a of on the with high CO and This can or from a to a with to and a in with and blood flow to also presents with both and to HDP with maternal venous Doppler are in the as to of may to venous by venous or venous compression to this evidence the of of the into and has clinical and is from an the any clinical the which and be considered the that with clinical use the (e.g. when on healthy pregnancy, maternal CO with fetal growth velocity and and the in SVR is with This is in with the of an between maternal cardiac and the in SVR with the of resistance in the uteroplacental there is a between fetal Doppler and maternal Maternal heart and of all to the blood flow rate in the The evidence of a between and fetal the of hemodynamic assessment in of fetal The most of FGR is uteroplacental from FGR has been as a The to the and fetal This is by uterine artery and vascular A interpretation of the pathophysiology of FGR has from the that function is on its systemic cardiovascular in pregnancy is to ensure function. have the of FGR as an for the development of cardiovascular in a with the in of the most and of the of The of FGR is based on fetal and Doppler and is as or to presents or after of pregnancy, FGR has low and is by uterine with high of and and to While is that with of artery is with maternal hemodynamic assessment provides evidence of uteroplacental with of maternal cardiovascular in with FGR. with a prepregnancy or maternal hemodynamic with low high SVR and a have an of and this hemodynamic is the hemodynamic can be in healthy women at preclinical of the and SVR to be the most The that in with there is an of FGR the that the maternal cardiovascular system a role in the of with FGR, FGR is less with development and artery The clinical challenge is its and to the clinical to the that FGR also in with size or fetal However, FGR, with a of is more FGR and has an clinical The between FGR and is less that in FGR, and the with healthy pregnancy are FGR, with FGR, less in uterine artery of all there is a of uterine artery Doppler in the that this in uterine vascular resistance is not related to but is an of that the maternal cardiovascular there is a of low This the low of uterine artery Doppler to FGR and the of maternal hemodynamic assessment in The may be for maternal cardiovascular assessment for of at of by FGR, maternal hemodynamic not cardiovascular but a with low CO and high fetal size or is the a is to between age and FGR. be but healthy at of of is for their management and to maternal and size are to from FGR (e.g. fetal growth Doppler Maternal hemodynamics an role in FGR from A pregnancy by FGR is by maternal CO and while a pregnancy with a is by a maternal hemodynamic to that of a healthy Assessment of blood flow provide more into the between fetal and maternal cardiovascular and is evidence that the hemodynamic and that are in women with HDP not women to be hypertensive in the with of cardiac and are at of cardiovascular in from a that cardiovascular may be improved by monitoring and of BP in the the hemodynamic assessment and management of women HDP is considered The development of after pregnancy by HDP largely the of cardiovascular A that more in the in women by The of HDP and/or is related to and or gestational The of cardiovascular with factors after an of HDP to metabolic and rate of systematic have been regarding their with an of cardiovascular It that a cardiovascular system with subclinical be by the demands pregnancy, and/or that the stress of HDP of a cardiovascular The use of cardiovascular does not of cardiovascular complications, a including maternal BP and in the women at of HDP pregnancy is a future cardiovascular the of HDP in pregnancy help in for the and in HDP with high a high between and growth are more with the women who HDP with of cardiac BP levels and A that women who which is more with FGR, of cardiovascular in the and clinical of the there is a between of HDP and of cardiovascular be by a of the most of the Profound are in most women with including left ventricular cardiac and diastolic with a of also have cardiac and evidence of diastolic and in the after this there are recommendations regarding cardiac evaluation after However, women with of or of volume require to women with HDP and those with HDP with left ventricular and diastolic at echocardiography are more to develop in the to a BP in a HDP to This the interpretation of HDP not as but as a of a subclinical and that diastolic BP does not to levels the the BP measurements be in the as or BP that BP is It is by is a of clinical and may also in care related to can with the between and BP levels that that is to BP for at the the in BP in women with with BP in the and in of A of BP and and in women who HDP high and and a in BP BP was on more the diastolic BP was on after A that the diastolic BP was more in those to BP those with standard This is of a of to cardiovascular by monitoring and management of BP management and/or cardiovascular has been largely It is that the from a be to women with or using a of However, are available for prevention or for the regarding HDP as an additional to of as a were in a in the in who This of a in in the arm diastolic BP, diastolic function and improved left ventricular at and the to help the future cardiovascular of women who have been to The between HDP and FGR and maternal in cardiovascular both and after development of the clinical presents an for using assessment of maternal hemodynamics in the clinical evidence of maternal cardiovascular in to develop HDP and FGR, of in pregnancy is not the wide between and The of of using uterine artery Doppler and maternal and body index presents a and assessment of uterine artery Doppler has been the between high SVR to and factors such as high and low is to that maternal cardiovascular function to pregnancy the of HDP and FGR. in women with cardiovascular to that of a and from a that to pregnancy the of BP in hypertensive pregnant has the for and in the of HDP or in though the for this is such as have been proposed for the prevention of with the to maternal hemodynamic their is the of this in the of in the for in HDP and have largely over the as and the as as and as are the of The for HDP and is is usually because of maternal or of for HDP to This can be by or both of by or by are used with to the of of HDP and the of FGR. of the of and provide a for targeted that to compensate for the cardiovascular is to that BP in may a As FGR with especially at gestational at is for CO and BP to be in order not to the uteroplacental The of a hemodynamic of HDP has clinical The of offering opportunities for of in in SVR with a in are less in vascular HDP for this clinical management have been the of by after in of women with HDP with including has been with their use be considered in of HDP with fetal are to evaluate the gestational and of targeted in or between HDP and HDP also a and of the role of targeted in both and clinical of and management with in of and/or the of and venous of the A that and growth velocity in are to in HDP in this BP or improved obstetric and the of in HDP with by a and its use in clinical practice has been to of to pulmonary in in by in of of has been from the use of or is evidence to the of in with of more are has in and arterial and function in women with a of the evidence is that the assessment of maternal hemodynamics to knowledge on the pathophysiology of gestational However, is to what are and Further research is to the research on the most and maternal hemodynamic used or in and on their reference The value of assessing the of the maternal venous system and body or in with cardiac and arterial be hemodynamic is limited to a or to all pregnant women also be that are to of in maternal hemodynamics and to in by the cardiovascular is to in the index pregnancy, or in the cardiovascular system is by The and of to be is regarding in maternal hemodynamics in the preclinical among pregnant women at of who are and/or using be are to evaluate the and of a that help to women at of HDP and pregnancy The use available reference ranges for both maternal cardiac and arterial They for factors and and is a for and cardiovascular is to the that women at of cardiovascular and future management in have in maternal hemodynamics among pregnant women with pregnancy or fetal those of and those who require at the time of provide guidance regarding the of maternal hemodynamic assessment in the clinical in Assessment of maternal including venous function and volume is to between and This can also help from However, the and of require The use of and continuous monitoring is maternal healthcare. maternal hemodynamic for factors and and is to be with of the cardiovascular system in are to evaluate the for to clinical and critically evaluate the role of and of arterial and HDP are It to be determined targeted may obstetric and are to evaluate the of of the maternal hemodynamic in pregnant women with The that the of of maternal hemodynamics to and the monitoring of gestational complications be to obstetric and but this has to be The of maternal hemodynamic assessment is an to the and of such as and As the of with is on the hemodynamic assessment provides opportunities to prevention with the of maternal cardiovascular function The to women with a of in prevention be the The clinical of to be is with in diastolic and arterial this in to vascular more to the of and vascular Maternal hemodynamic assessment provides additional clinical that is for management of by HDP and/or FGR. a of for and prevention of maternal hemodynamic which may both the index pregnancy and future maternal cardiovascular to the members of the International Maternal Group for their and to this of Obstetrics and the of Obstetrics and the and of the of and of of Obstetrics and of Clinical and of of of of and of Obstetrics and of of This Consensus Statement be and ISUOG Consensus Statement on maternal hemodynamic assessment in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal growth Ultrasound is not to this as were or in this

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.70040
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ISUOG Consensus Statement on maternal hemodynamic assessment in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal growth restriction

Marc E. A. Spaanderman, B. Thilaganathan, H. Valensise, Tamara Stampalija et al.
3 citations
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
6.17
article

ISUOG Consensus Statement on maternal hemodynamic assessment in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal growth restriction

Marc E. A. Spaanderman, B. Thilaganathan, H. Valensise, Tamara Stampalija, Wilfried Gyselaers, T. Ghi, Jerome M J Cornette, Taher A. Mousa, Eros Ferrazzí, C. Lees
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) is a scientific organization that encourages sound clinical practice, and high-quality teaching and research, related to diagnostic imaging in women's healthcare. The ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee (CSC) has the remit to develop Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements as educational recommendations that provide healthcare practitioners with a consensus-based approach, from experts, for diagnostic imaging. They are intended to reflect what is considered by ISUOG to be the best practice at the time at which they are issued. Although ISUOG has made every effort to ensure that Guidelines and Consensus Statements are accurate when issued, neither the Society nor any of its employees or members accepts any liability for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements issued by the CSC. The ISUOG CSC documents are not intended to establish a legal standard of care because interpretation of the evidence that underpins them may be influenced by individual circumstances, local protocol and available resources. Approved Guidelines and Consensus Statements can be distributed freely with the permission of ISUOG ([email protected]). Pregnancy presents a unique cardiovascular challenge. Profound maternal hemodynamic adjustments result from a complex interplay between the maternal cardiovascular system and uteroplacental perfusion, which permits fetal development while maintaining healthy maternal homeostasis1-5. Failure to meet this challenge can lead to maternal hypertensive complications (hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP)) and/or fetal growth disorders (fetal growth restriction (FGR))6-9. Monitoring and management of HDP and FGR has been based largely on maternal blood pressure (BP) monitoring and fetal growth assessment10. Promising research offers the prospect of a less reactive and more proactive approach. Maladaptation to the requirements of pregnancy can be detected in a preclinical phase of HDP and FGR by maternal hemodynamic assessment, offering opportunities for targeted hemodynamic interventions11-15. Pregnancy also serves as a stress test for future cardiovascular health, especially if superimposed upon subclinical cardiometabolic or cardiovascular vulnerabilities11, 16-19. This Consensus Statement provides an update on the role of maternal hemodynamic assessment in HDP and FGR. A proposal for this Consensus Statement was submitted to and evaluated by the ISUOG CSC. The authors of this Consensus are members of the International Working Group on Maternal Hemodynamics (https://maternalhemodynamics.com/) and were involved in both the development and the writing stages. Members of the International Working Group on Maternal Hemodynamics who were not involved in the writing of this Consensus were invited to review the document (reviewing group) and those who responded are acknowledged. Stakeholders were not included in the writing process. This process was not intended to represent a systematic review. The preselected topics were divided among the authors, who worked in pairs and performed a literature search. T.S. collated the document and proposed the key points. The final document and key points were revised by all authors. Several meetings were organized to discuss any points on which there was not initial consensus, until complete agreement was reached. The document was then finalized after comments from the reviewing group, the ISUOG CSC and the ISUOG Board of Trustees. The authors of this Consensus Statement are experts in the field of maternal hemodynamics and have expressed their opinion based on the available literature and evidence. Any clinician applying this Consensus is expected to use their independent medical judgement in the context of the individual clinical circumstances to determine patient care. Traditionally, peripheral BP is measured by auscultation using an arm cuff connected to a manometer. Increasingly, automated oscillometric devices, validated for pregnancy, are becoming the recommended standard20, 21. Further developments have allowed additional analysis of the arterial waveform for estimation of central BP and arterial function. Markers of arterial stiffness and compliance, such as pulsed-wave velocity and the augmentation index (AIx)22, 23, help to understand the pathophysiology behind HDP and FGR, predict cardiovascular complications, and evaluate and direct prevention and treatment24-26. Assessment of central hemodynamic factors that determine BP (cardiac output (CO, in L/min) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR, in dyne.s/cm5)) is increasingly accessible using easily operable devices27. Considering the pivotal role of central hemodynamic functioning, this Consensus Statement focuses primarily on CO assessment. CO is the product of stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) (CO = SV × HR). Accuracy of its evaluation is improved by averaging measurements over several heartbeats3-5, to compensate for respiratory variations. After 20 gestational weeks, CO is best evaluated with the woman in a left lateral position, to minimize caval and aortic compression by the gravid uterus28, 29. The heart can rapidly modulate CO in order to meet the demands of pregnancy, with a wide range of normality (4–20 L/min) depending on activity level, age, fitness, body size, gestational age and metabolic rate. While trimester-specific reference ranges exist, device-specific normalization, that takes into account maternal age and posture, does not. Indexing for actual or prepregnancy body surface area or height may be of additional value when comparing measurements between individuals27, 30-32. Individual or separate CO measurements can be of value for instant hemodynamic assessment, while repeated or continuous measurements are appropriate for trend analysis. With knowledge of CO and BP, SVR can be calculated ((SVR = 80 × (MAP − RAP)/CO) in dyne.s/cm5), where MAP represents mean arterial pressure and RAP is right atrial pressure. RAP (or central venous pressure) is usually low in pregnancy (0–5 mmHg) and therefore is usually omitted from the calculation33, 34. Arterial function can also be evaluated by Doppler assessment of peripheral vessels, for example the uterine and/or opthalmic arteries. CO is determined most accurately by invasive measurements using thermodilution or indicator (lithium) dilution, or by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The former require insertion of intracardiac, central venous and/or arterial catheters (e.g. pulmonary artery catheters), limiting their indication to critically ill pregnant women in an intensive care unit setting33, 34 . Cardiac MRI is non-invasive, but its limited availability and high cost restrict its use in an obstetric context28, 35. Transthoracic echocardiography permits non-invasive assessment of CO by measuring the left ventricular outflow tract diameter and pulsed-wave Doppler outflow signal along with HR. It has been validated against invasive measurements in severely ill pregnant women and can be considered an alternative reference technique36, 37. Transthoracic echocardiography enables evaluation of systolic and/or diastolic function (assessing ejection fraction using two-dimensional and/or M-mode imaging, strain and strain rate using speckle tracking, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and mitral inflow using pulse-wave and tissue Doppler imaging) and preload assessment (atrial size and inferior vena cava size and collapsibility)38-40. Another means of assessing CO is with a non-invasive mobile device, using a continuous-wave Doppler transducer placed in the suprasternal notch40. This technique is limited by assumptions regarding the left ventricular outflow tract diameter and acoustic guidance for probe orientation. However, by including more heartbeats in the calculation, the accuracy is enhanced. An inert gas rebreathing technique can be used to calculate CO based on Fick's principle41. A blood-soluble and an insoluble gas are delivered though a closed breathing assembly and relative levels over a few respiratory cycles are measured by a gas analyzer in the mouthpiece. As with pulmonary artery catheters, pulmonary blood flow or right ventricular output is measured, which is usually identical to left ventricular output. this technique is more for research clinical With and a is between on the CO can be by in or phase by blood flow the cardiac analysis CO from a peripheral arterial which can be or and and are and continuous monitoring for trend but their to calculate CO are based on assumptions that may non-invasive in pregnancy against reference The few that have been with reference the for and trend CO with technique are not with those using and the be used be to the from devices, as their permits the of of hemodynamic using a in the patient the between and the of over As may be for monitoring as pregnancy pregnancy, the body cardiovascular to hemodynamic to to the metabolic and demands from the and and to the for blood understand the role of maternal hemodynamics in is to understand in healthy pregnancy, as maternal hemodynamic is a for development of a Maternal hemodynamic can be the to the the the volume CO and central and peripheral arterial are while the MAP and SVR are are in pregnancy, from of to the development of a The maternal hemodynamic in pregnancy is that a in by to as the most to vascular to a in MAP and a in The initial in CO is by an in are by to in flow and rate and in The result of is and with and The preload to improved cardiac with cardiac this in SV in As a result of the maternal heart the left atrial left ventricular diastolic and systolic and ventricular all in cardiac surface area and Maternal cardiac at of but at of The of CO is also by cardiac which is by the in while the pressure is with arterial venous a of to preload and of A of is the of this but has been that including and by the and factors (e.g. vascular a role in maternal hemodynamic in which mean that the maternal hemodynamic in pregnancy develop from the After the healthy pregnancy is by hemodynamic including in CO and in SVR and and in maternal cardiac function. cardiac preload and result in SV and CO in the of SV by in pregnancy and by 20 the of pregnancy, the in SV is that there is between pregnant and The CO is also by the maternal which by in pregnancy and to until The CO by and by to pregnancy, a mean of between and of It as to CO until or in in between can be by in their and/or and CO to prepregnancy from to in pregnancy, the and the to levels after of the is in the arterial while are in the venous and represent a SVR with an in and in the MAP pregnancy until of because the in CO is not to the in systolic and diastolic BP the in diastolic BP is that in central and systolic is also a in arterial which the central systolic systolic BP systolic BP the uterine artery which to the uteroplacental The BP to levels the preload and have a on maternal cardiac function in the of The in left ventricular diastolic function in the to be determined by an of left ventricular left ventricular diastolic function to as by a to in the and pregnancy, The left ventricular by healthy pregnancy represents a and that has usually by maternal hemodynamic have been in with including CO and SVR The of blood volume and the of such as and are to in maternal systolic and diastolic function have been from the to the diastolic and mean BP a trend their at on left ventricular systolic expressed by fraction or or by tissue Doppler by velocity relative diastolic is as by a in the mitral and an in the with of the tissue Doppler in and in that the maternal heart is to adjustments the of a of there are cardiovascular The of ventricular may on the volume in the of may lead to in the with the diastolic phase and atrial to left ventricular the the of an pregnancy at the of the maternal heart may diastolic as in the of cardiac It is that of diastolic have been at echocardiography in women who or in a maternal the left ventricular is in with but there are in systolic and diastolic left ventricular The of cardiac is between and cardiovascular those in in and in to the in volume of the maternal cardiovascular in maternal cardiac function in from to pregnancy, an in CO and a in It is cardiac with to maternal CO in because of the in the blood a CO in the in to cardiac the of pregnancy after with the of of systolic such as ejection fraction and tissue Doppler which have been to those in the This may that the to the maternal heart by the may the ventricular in the and that complete is The of was based on the of clinical or after 34 of a more with of maternal or with fetal growth that the development of maternal in with of and The maternal hemodynamic are between the both in the and in the phase of the A system has been proposed that is based on maternal hemodynamics and fetal with FGR is by low CO and high in both preclinical and of the with fetal growth is not by low while the SVR in the preclinical phase of the is low and may in the This between by and the by As the of BP as the product of CO and SVR is is the result of CO or The that the is the of is by the of subclinical hemodynamic function in the in women who An of and that the process with is a result a maternal hemodynamic hemodynamic function not to gestational complications, but also to cardiovascular in hemodynamics may be a direct between fetal growth and cardiovascular and While maternal cardiovascular a role in the development of not the of which is when in The between maternal hemodynamics and the system be a of future The of into or the hemodynamic from pregnancy until in women who develop all a hemodynamic between CO and SVR was at all of pregnancy in women who presents with SVR and a of on the with high CO and This can or from a to a with to and a in with and blood flow to also presents with both and to HDP with maternal venous Doppler are in the as to of may to venous by venous or venous compression to this evidence the of of the into and has clinical and is from an the any clinical the which and be considered the that with clinical use the (e.g. when on healthy pregnancy, maternal CO with fetal growth velocity and and the in SVR is with This is in with the of an between maternal cardiac and the in SVR with the of resistance in the uteroplacental there is a between fetal Doppler and maternal Maternal heart and of all to the blood flow rate in the The evidence of a between and fetal the of hemodynamic assessment in of fetal The most of FGR is uteroplacental from FGR has been as a The to the and fetal This is by uterine artery and vascular A interpretation of the pathophysiology of FGR has from the that function is on its systemic cardiovascular in pregnancy is to ensure function. have the of FGR as an for the development of cardiovascular in a with the in of the most and of the of The of FGR is based on fetal and Doppler and is as or to presents or after of pregnancy, FGR has low and is by uterine with high of and and to While is that with of artery is with maternal hemodynamic assessment provides evidence of uteroplacental with of maternal cardiovascular in with FGR. with a prepregnancy or maternal hemodynamic with low high SVR and a have an of and this hemodynamic is the hemodynamic can be in healthy women at preclinical of the and SVR to be the most The that in with there is an of FGR the that the maternal cardiovascular system a role in the of with FGR, FGR is less with development and artery The clinical challenge is its and to the clinical to the that FGR also in with size or fetal However, FGR, with a of is more FGR and has an clinical The between FGR and is less that in FGR, and the with healthy pregnancy are FGR, with FGR, less in uterine artery of all there is a of uterine artery Doppler in the that this in uterine vascular resistance is not related to but is an of that the maternal cardiovascular there is a of low This the low of uterine artery Doppler to FGR and the of maternal hemodynamic assessment in The may be for maternal cardiovascular assessment for of at of by FGR, maternal hemodynamic not cardiovascular but a with low CO and high fetal size or is the a is to between age and FGR. be but healthy at of of is for their management and to maternal and size are to from FGR (e.g. fetal growth Doppler Maternal hemodynamics an role in FGR from A pregnancy by FGR is by maternal CO and while a pregnancy with a is by a maternal hemodynamic to that of a healthy Assessment of blood flow provide more into the between fetal and maternal cardiovascular and is evidence that the hemodynamic and that are in women with HDP not women to be hypertensive in the with of cardiac and are at of cardiovascular in from a that cardiovascular may be improved by monitoring and of BP in the the hemodynamic assessment and management of women HDP is considered The development of after pregnancy by HDP largely the of cardiovascular A that more in the in women by The of HDP and/or is related to and or gestational The of cardiovascular with factors after an of HDP to metabolic and rate of systematic have been regarding their with an of cardiovascular It that a cardiovascular system with subclinical be by the demands pregnancy, and/or that the stress of HDP of a cardiovascular The use of cardiovascular does not of cardiovascular complications, a including maternal BP and in the women at of HDP pregnancy is a future cardiovascular the of HDP in pregnancy help in for the and in HDP with high a high between and growth are more with the women who HDP with of cardiac BP levels and A that women who which is more with FGR, of cardiovascular in the and clinical of the there is a between of HDP and of cardiovascular be by a of the most of the Profound are in most women with including left ventricular cardiac and diastolic with a of also have cardiac and evidence of diastolic and in the after this there are recommendations regarding cardiac evaluation after However, women with of or of volume require to women with HDP and those with HDP with left ventricular and diastolic at echocardiography are more to develop in the to a BP in a HDP to This the interpretation of HDP not as but as a of a subclinical and that diastolic BP does not to levels the the BP measurements be in the as or BP that BP is It is by is a of clinical and may also in care related to can with the between and BP levels that that is to BP for at the the in BP in women with with BP in the and in of A of BP and and in women who HDP high and and a in BP BP was on more the diastolic BP was on after A that the diastolic BP was more in those to BP those with standard This is of a of to cardiovascular by monitoring and management of BP management and/or cardiovascular has been largely It is that the from a be to women with or using a of However, are available for prevention or for the regarding HDP as an additional to of as a were in a in the in who This of a in in the arm diastolic BP, diastolic function and improved left ventricular at and the to help the future cardiovascular of women who have been to The between HDP and FGR and maternal in cardiovascular both and after development of the clinical presents an for using assessment of maternal hemodynamics in the clinical evidence of maternal cardiovascular in to develop HDP and FGR, of in pregnancy is not the wide between and The of of using uterine artery Doppler and maternal and body index presents a and assessment of uterine artery Doppler has been the between high SVR to and factors such as high and low is to that maternal cardiovascular function to pregnancy the of HDP and FGR. in women with cardiovascular to that of a and from a that to pregnancy the of BP in hypertensive pregnant has the for and in the of HDP or in though the for this is such as have been proposed for the prevention of with the to maternal hemodynamic their is the of this in the of in the for in HDP and have largely over the as and the as as and as are the of The for HDP and is is usually because of maternal or of for HDP to This can be by or both of by or by are used with to the of of HDP and the of FGR. of the of and provide a for targeted that to compensate for the cardiovascular is to that BP in may a As FGR with especially at gestational at is for CO and BP to be in order not to the uteroplacental The of a hemodynamic of HDP has clinical The of offering opportunities for of in in SVR with a in are less in vascular HDP for this clinical management have been the of by after in of women with HDP with including has been with their use be considered in of HDP with fetal are to evaluate the gestational and of targeted in or between HDP and HDP also a and of the role of targeted in both and clinical of and management with in of and/or the of and venous of the A that and growth velocity in are to in HDP in this BP or improved obstetric and the of in HDP with by a and its use in clinical practice has been to of to pulmonary in in by in of of has been from the use of or is evidence to the of in with of more are has in and arterial and function in women with a of the evidence is that the assessment of maternal hemodynamics to knowledge on the pathophysiology of gestational However, is to what are and Further research is to the research on the most and maternal hemodynamic used or in and on their reference The value of assessing the of the maternal venous system and body or in with cardiac and arterial be hemodynamic is limited to a or to all pregnant women also be that are to of in maternal hemodynamics and to in by the cardiovascular is to in the index pregnancy, or in the cardiovascular system is by The and of to be is regarding in maternal hemodynamics in the preclinical among pregnant women at of who are and/or using be are to evaluate the and of a that help to women at of HDP and pregnancy The use available reference ranges for both maternal cardiac and arterial They for factors and and is a for and cardiovascular is to the that women at of cardiovascular and future management in have in maternal hemodynamics among pregnant women with pregnancy or fetal those of and those who require at the time of provide guidance regarding the of maternal hemodynamic assessment in the clinical in Assessment of maternal including venous function and volume is to between and This can also help from However, the and of require The use of and continuous monitoring is maternal healthcare. maternal hemodynamic for factors and and is to be with of the cardiovascular system in are to evaluate the for to clinical and critically evaluate the role of and of arterial and HDP are It to be determined targeted may obstetric and are to evaluate the of of the maternal hemodynamic in pregnant women with The that the of of maternal hemodynamics to and the monitoring of gestational complications be to obstetric and but this has to be The of maternal hemodynamic assessment is an to the and of such as and As the of with is on the hemodynamic assessment provides opportunities to prevention with the of maternal cardiovascular function The to women with a of in prevention be the The clinical of to be is with in diastolic and arterial this in to vascular more to the of and vascular Maternal hemodynamic assessment provides additional clinical that is for management of by HDP and/or FGR. a of for and prevention of maternal hemodynamic which may both the index pregnancy and future maternal cardiovascular to the members of the International Maternal Group for their and to this of Obstetrics and the of Obstetrics and the and of the of and of of Obstetrics and of Clinical and of of of of and of Obstetrics and of of This Consensus Statement be and ISUOG Consensus Statement on maternal hemodynamic assessment in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal growth Ultrasound is not to this as were or in this

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 66(5)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of London (GB), University of Trieste (IT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), University of Leicester (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), University of Milan (IT), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Erasmus MC (NL), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Maastricht University (NL), Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital (GB), Policlinico Casilino (IT), Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE), Imperial College London (GB), Hasselt University (BE)
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università degli Studi di Milano, University of Leicester, Imperial College London, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Radboud Universiteit, Universiteit Maastricht, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Universiteit Hasselt, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's, University of London
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
6.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.