Unveiling sex dimorphism in the healthy cardiac anatomy: Fundamental differences between male and female heart shapes

Sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease are well documented, yet the precise nature and extent of these discrepancies in cardiac anatomy remain incompletely understood. Traditional scaling models often fail to capture the interplay of age, blood pressure and body size, prompting a more nuanced investigation. Here we use statistical shape modelling in a healthy subset (n = 456) of the UK Biobank to explore sex-specific variations in biventricular anatomy. We reconstruct 3D meshes and perform multivariate analyses of shape coefficients, controlling for age, blood pressure and various body size metrics. Our findings reveal that sex alone explains at least 25% of morphological variability, with strong discrimination between men and women (AUC = 0.96-0.71) persisting even after correction for confounders. Notably, the most discriminative modes highlight pronounced differences in cardiac chamber volumes, the anterior-posterior width of the right ventricle and the relative positioning of the cardiac chambers. These results underscore that sex has a fundamental influence on cardiac morphology, which may have important clinical implications for differing cardiac structural assessments in men and women. Future work should investigate how these anatomical differences manifest in various cardiovascular conditions, ultimately paving the way for more precise risk stratification and personalised therapeutic strategies for both men and women. KEY POINTS: Men's and women's hearts differ significantly in overall shape and size, but an in-depth quantification of these sex differences in healthy cardiac anatomy is lacking. We used a three-dimensional statistical shape modelling approach that goes beyond standard clinical measurements to capture subtle anatomical features. Our findings show that sex alone accounts for at least 25% of the natural variation in heart structure, even after correcting for age, blood pressure and various body size metric confounders. Female hearts consistently present smaller chambers and different inter-chamber positioning compared with male hearts. Our findings highlight the importance of sex-specific anatomical insights for better diagnosis, treatment and research on heart disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physiology
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/jp288667
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling sex dimorphism in the healthy cardiac anatomy: Fundamental differences between male and female heart shapes

Julio A. Chirinos, Mathias Peirlinck, Cameron Beeche, Patrick Segers et al.
2 citations
The Journal of Physiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
2.78
article

Unveiling sex dimorphism in the healthy cardiac anatomy: Fundamental differences between male and female heart shapes

Julio A. Chirinos, Mathias Peirlinck, Cameron Beeche, Patrick Segers, Beatrice Moscoloni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease are well documented, yet the precise nature and extent of these discrepancies in cardiac anatomy remain incompletely understood. Traditional scaling models often fail to capture the interplay of age, blood pressure and body size, prompting a more nuanced investigation. Here we use statistical shape modelling in a healthy subset (n = 456) of the UK Biobank to explore sex-specific variations in biventricular anatomy. We reconstruct 3D meshes and perform multivariate analyses of shape coefficients, controlling for age, blood pressure and various body size metrics. Our findings reveal that sex alone explains at least 25% of morphological variability, with strong discrimination between men and women (AUC = 0.96-0.71) persisting even after correction for confounders. Notably, the most discriminative modes highlight pronounced differences in cardiac chamber volumes, the anterior-posterior width of the right ventricle and the relative positioning of the cardiac chambers. These results underscore that sex has a fundamental influence on cardiac morphology, which may have important clinical implications for differing cardiac structural assessments in men and women. Future work should investigate how these anatomical differences manifest in various cardiovascular conditions, ultimately paving the way for more precise risk stratification and personalised therapeutic strategies for both men and women. KEY POINTS: Men's and women's hearts differ significantly in overall shape and size, but an in-depth quantification of these sex differences in healthy cardiac anatomy is lacking. We used a three-dimensional statistical shape modelling approach that goes beyond standard clinical measurements to capture subtle anatomical features. Our findings show that sex alone accounts for at least 25% of the natural variation in heart structure, even after correcting for age, blood pressure and various body size metric confounders. Female hearts consistently present smaller chambers and different inter-chamber positioning compared with male hearts. Our findings highlight the importance of sex-specific anatomical insights for better diagnosis, treatment and research on heart disease.

The Journal of Physiology
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Ghent University (BE), University of Pennsylvania (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
European Commission, Universiteit Gent, Vlaamse regering, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.