QUALITY IN TERMS OF DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

Providing quality medical and dental services has become a major task and priority of every health system. Dental medicine, as an integral part of primary and specialized medical care, in order to function properly requires clear and reliable indicators for assessing the dental care, which ensure that the dental services provided are timely, safe, effective and focused on the specific needs of the patient. In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in interest in measuring and assessing the quality of dental services and various research approaches have been used for this purpose. The most widely used quality assessment model is Donabedian’s invented in 1988, which categorizes the assessment indicators into three main groups: structure, process and outcome.Aim: The present study aims to present a systematic review of dental service quality indicators and to assess their applicability in clinical practice.Materials and methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature on the topic published in the period from 1980 to 2025 was conducted, including articles from the databases PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Wiley. Keywords which were used for the purposes of scientific research are: “oral health care quality”, “quality of dental services”, “dental quality indicators”, “Donabedian´s model”. Only publications with validated indicators for assessing the quality of dental services were included in the scientific study.Results: The results of the scientific study show that the most frequently used indicators are from the process group, which reflects the desire for traceability and control over daily clinical dental activity. Outcome indicators, such as the indicator of patient satisfaction with the provided dental care and Oral Health- related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), are described in the scientific literature as being more difficult to measure. Digitalization in dentistry creates the need to create new indicators, such as Dental Data Synthetic Index (DDSI), which assesses the level of digital awareness and maturity of a dental practice, in the context of providing quality dental care.Conclusion: In the sense of global efforts to improve patients’ dental health and optimize resources, the definition and implementation of standardized indicators for the quality of dental services is key to evaluating and improving dental practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij0403041g
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QUALITY IN TERMS OF DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

Gergana Georgieva
MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

QUALITY IN TERMS OF DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

Gergana Georgieva
article en

Abstract

Providing quality medical and dental services has become a major task and priority of every health system. Dental medicine, as an integral part of primary and specialized medical care, in order to function properly requires clear and reliable indicators for assessing the dental care, which ensure that the dental services provided are timely, safe, effective and focused on the specific needs of the patient. In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in interest in measuring and assessing the quality of dental services and various research approaches have been used for this purpose. The most widely used quality assessment model is Donabedian’s invented in 1988, which categorizes the assessment indicators into three main groups: structure, process and outcome.Aim: The present study aims to present a systematic review of dental service quality indicators and to assess their applicability in clinical practice.Materials and methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature on the topic published in the period from 1980 to 2025 was conducted, including articles from the databases PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Wiley. Keywords which were used for the purposes of scientific research are: “oral health care quality”, “quality of dental services”, “dental quality indicators”, “Donabedian´s model”. Only publications with validated indicators for assessing the quality of dental services were included in the scientific study.Results: The results of the scientific study show that the most frequently used indicators are from the process group, which reflects the desire for traceability and control over daily clinical dental activity. Outcome indicators, such as the indicator of patient satisfaction with the provided dental care and Oral Health- related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), are described in the scientific literature as being more difficult to measure. Digitalization in dentistry creates the need to create new indicators, such as Dental Data Synthetic Index (DDSI), which assesses the level of digital awareness and maturity of a dental practice, in the context of providing quality dental care.Conclusion: In the sense of global efforts to improve patients’ dental health and optimize resources, the definition and implementation of standardized indicators for the quality of dental services is key to evaluating and improving dental practice.

MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and ResearchVol. 4(3)
Medical University of Varna (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.