Qudit vs. qubit: Simulated performance of error-correction codes in higher dimensions

Qudits can be described by a state vector in a q-dimensional Hilbert space, enabling a more extensive encoding and manipulation of information compared to qubits. This implies that conducting fault-tolerant quantum computations using qudits rather than qubits might entail less overhead. In this work, we investigate the viability of qudits in error-correction codes by creating and simulating the quantum circuitry for the smallest qudit error-correction code with a multidimensional circuit-level noise model and specifically adapted decoders. After introducing a flag qudit to protect the code from hook errors, comparable error thresholds of the order of 10-4 are obtained for qudits of dimensions 2, 3, and 5.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/2w52-qd2j
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qudit vs. qubit: Simulated performance of error-correction codes in higher dimensions

Bart Sorée, George Simion, Vukan Levajac, Quinten Eggerickx et al.
2 citations
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
article

Qudit vs. qubit: Simulated performance of error-correction codes in higher dimensions

Bart Sorée, George Simion, Vukan Levajac, Quinten Eggerickx, James Keppens
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Qudits can be described by a state vector in a q-dimensional Hilbert space, enabling a more extensive encoding and manipulation of information compared to qubits. This implies that conducting fault-tolerant quantum computations using qudits rather than qubits might entail less overhead. In this work, we investigate the viability of qudits in error-correction codes by creating and simulating the quantum circuitry for the smallest qudit error-correction code with a multidimensional circuit-level noise model and specifically adapted decoders. After introducing a flag qudit to protect the code from hook errors, comparable error thresholds of the order of 10-4 are obtained for qudits of dimensions 2, 3, and 5.

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 112(3)
University of Antwerp (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Qudit vs. qubit: Simulated performance of error-correction codes in higher dimensions — Bart Sorée, George Simion, et al. · Physical review. A/Physical review, A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS