What if NIH had been 40% smaller?

Authors

Pierre Azoulay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-4824)
Matthew Clancy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-1038)
Bhaven N. Sampat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-6706)
Danielle Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-1330)

Institutions

National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Science
Published: 2025-09-25
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeb1564
Citations: 6
Primary Topic: Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 11.27

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

What if NIH had been 40% smaller?

Pierre Azoulay, Matthew Clancy, Bhaven N. Sampat, Danielle Li

Sep 25, 2025

6 citations

Science

Health and Medical Research Impacts

11.27

article

What if NIH had been 40% smaller?

Pierre Azoulay, Matthew Clancy, Bhaven N. Sampat, Danielle Li

September 25, 2025article en

6 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

ScienceVol. 389(6767)

National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)

Openalex Percentile: Top 1%

Health and Medical Research Impacts

11.27

DOI Source OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What if NIH had been 40% smaller? — Pierre Azoulay, Matthew Clancy, et al. · Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS