Deconstruction of Debt-Trap Diplomacy and China Loans in Africa

The growing interest in Chinese loans from African nations in recent years has generated robust debate among scholars in international relations. One perspective argues that the loans from China are a debt trap for African nations. According to another viewpoint, Chinese loans are useful for infrastructural development in Africa, compared to loans given by the Bretton Woods Institutions, where they are tied to many anti-development conditions. The paper is situated within the context of the later perspective to deconstruct the debt-trap diplomacy thesis on China’s loans in Africa using secondary sources of data and content analysis. This study reveals that Africa’s preference for Chinese loans has been attributed to China’s willingness to engage in Africa’s ambitious plans for infrastructure development. Also, China’s hands-off approach extends to issues of governance in Africa, emphasising that only Africa can solve their governance problems and not making it a prerequisite for loans when compared to the Bretton Woods Institutions that do not detach their interest from their loans to African nations. Furthermore, China treats African nations as partners in progress, contrasting with the treatment they receive from the Bretton Woods institutions. Finally, this study suggested that Africans actively shape the discourse surrounding Sino-African relations. African perspectives are overshadowed by Western narratives of Sino-African ties. African scholars should actively offer an Africa-focused analysis of these relationships to put African concerns front and at the centre of every discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hong Kong Review of Belt and Road Studies
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63596/oborjournal.3.2.2025.52-65
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstruction of Debt-Trap Diplomacy and China Loans in Africa

Zekeri Momoh
Hong Kong Review of Belt and Road Studies
International Development and Aid
article

Deconstruction of Debt-Trap Diplomacy and China Loans in Africa

Zekeri Momoh
article en

Abstract

The growing interest in Chinese loans from African nations in recent years has generated robust debate among scholars in international relations. One perspective argues that the loans from China are a debt trap for African nations. According to another viewpoint, Chinese loans are useful for infrastructural development in Africa, compared to loans given by the Bretton Woods Institutions, where they are tied to many anti-development conditions. The paper is situated within the context of the later perspective to deconstruct the debt-trap diplomacy thesis on China’s loans in Africa using secondary sources of data and content analysis. This study reveals that Africa’s preference for Chinese loans has been attributed to China’s willingness to engage in Africa’s ambitious plans for infrastructure development. Also, China’s hands-off approach extends to issues of governance in Africa, emphasising that only Africa can solve their governance problems and not making it a prerequisite for loans when compared to the Bretton Woods Institutions that do not detach their interest from their loans to African nations. Furthermore, China treats African nations as partners in progress, contrasting with the treatment they receive from the Bretton Woods institutions. Finally, this study suggested that Africans actively shape the discourse surrounding Sino-African relations. African perspectives are overshadowed by Western narratives of Sino-African ties. African scholars should actively offer an Africa-focused analysis of these relationships to put African concerns front and at the centre of every discussion.

Hong Kong Review of Belt and Road StudiesVol. 3(2(7))
Kumi University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.