Gamma/hadron separation with the Tibet AS$\gamma$ experiment by machine learning algorithms

In ground-based EAS (Extensive Air Shower) array experiments for gamma-ray observations, hadron-induced background cosmic-ray showers constitute over 99.9$\%$ of the shower particles detected at ground level compared to those originated by gamma rays. Therefore, a crucial step in analyzing data from these ground arrays involves the essential removal of these hadron-induced background showers. This work utilizes data recorded by both the surface array and underground muon detector array of the Tibet AS$\gamma$ experiment to discriminate between gamma-ray and hadron-induced showers within the energy range of 3 TeV to 1 PeV. The traditional gamma/hadron separation relies on two parameters: the sum of the particle density ($\sum{\rho}$) measured by the AS array and the number of muons ($\sum{N_{\mu}}$) measured by the MD array. This work introduces machine learning (ML) methods (MLP, XGBoost, LightGBM) that incorporate additional characteristic parameters—shower core position ($c_{x}$, $c_{y}$) and zenith angle ($\theta$) to improve the discrimination ability of gamma/hadron. Our study reveals that ML methods demonstrate significantly improved performance in gamma/hadron separation compared to conventional approaches in the high-energy (HE, E > $\sim$10 TeV) range. ML-based selections achieve over 10 times higher cosmic-ray rejection above 60 TeV, making these methods highly effective for studying PeVatrons. Moreover, ML methods provide more uniform discrimination across the entire detector area, unlike the traditional method which performs poorly outside the muon detector coverage. In contrast, in the low-energy (LE) mode (E < $\sim$10 TeV), where events are restricted to the central dense array, the performance of ML methods is comparable to the traditional approach, as both rely on selecting events with $\sum{N_{\mu}} = 0$.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/1.501.0893
Primary Topic
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gamma/hadron separation with the Tibet AS$\gamma$ experiment by machine learning algorithms

Chen Ding, Ying Zhang, Yiyang Li, Meng Yu et al.
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
article

Gamma/hadron separation with the Tibet AS$\gamma$ experiment by machine learning algorithms

Chen Ding, Ying Zhang, Yiyang Li, Meng Yu, Jing Huang, Yanlin Yu, Yihuan Zou, Liuming Zhai, Kongyi Hu
article en

Abstract

In ground-based EAS (Extensive Air Shower) array experiments for gamma-ray observations, hadron-induced background cosmic-ray showers constitute over 99.9$\%$ of the shower particles detected at ground level compared to those originated by gamma rays. Therefore, a crucial step in analyzing data from these ground arrays involves the essential removal of these hadron-induced background showers. This work utilizes data recorded by both the surface array and underground muon detector array of the Tibet AS$\gamma$ experiment to discriminate between gamma-ray and hadron-induced showers within the energy range of 3 TeV to 1 PeV. The traditional gamma/hadron separation relies on two parameters: the sum of the particle density ($\sum{\rho}$) measured by the AS array and the number of muons ($\sum{N_{\mu}}$) measured by the MD array. This work introduces machine learning (ML) methods (MLP, XGBoost, LightGBM) that incorporate additional characteristic parameters—shower core position ($c_{x}$, $c_{y}$) and zenith angle ($\theta$) to improve the discrimination ability of gamma/hadron. Our study reveals that ML methods demonstrate significantly improved performance in gamma/hadron separation compared to conventional approaches in the high-energy (HE, E > $\sim$10 TeV) range. ML-based selections achieve over 10 times higher cosmic-ray rejection above 60 TeV, making these methods highly effective for studying PeVatrons. Moreover, ML methods provide more uniform discrimination across the entire detector area, unlike the traditional method which performs poorly outside the muon detector coverage. In contrast, in the low-energy (LE) mode (E < $\sim$10 TeV), where events are restricted to the central dense array, the performance of ML methods is comparable to the traditional approach, as both rely on selecting events with $\sum{N_{\mu}} = 0$.

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Institute of High Energy Physics, High Energy Physics
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.