Challenging the Body‐Mind Split Through a Decolonial Perspective: A Response to Robertson, Vélez, Huynh, and Hairston

ABSTRACT As part of the special issue Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Justice and Dignity in Science Education, this paper responds to Robertson and colleagues' article: “Exposing and Challenging ‘Grit’ in Physics Education.” It examines affect theory and its connections to science identity formation. However, the paper critiques the body‐mind split inherent in affect theory, arguing it stems from colonial epistemologies. Through a decolonial analysis, the paper proposes an integrative framework informed by nondominant epistemologies. It argues that racism and colonization hinder learning possibilities and scientific advancement. The paper emphasizes shared responsibility for dismantling oppressive structures, including the “grit” discourse identified in the original paper. It aims to facilitate individual reflection and encourage collective action, fostering positive change within physics spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging the Body‐Mind Split Through a Decolonial Perspective: A Response to Robertson, Vélez, Huynh, and Hairston

Katemari Rosa
1 citations
Science Education
Race, History, and American Society
4.20
article

Challenging the Body‐Mind Split Through a Decolonial Perspective: A Response to Robertson, Vélez, Huynh, and Hairston

Katemari Rosa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As part of the special issue Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Justice and Dignity in Science Education, this paper responds to Robertson and colleagues' article: “Exposing and Challenging ‘Grit’ in Physics Education.” It examines affect theory and its connections to science identity formation. However, the paper critiques the body‐mind split inherent in affect theory, arguing it stems from colonial epistemologies. Through a decolonial analysis, the paper proposes an integrative framework informed by nondominant epistemologies. It argues that racism and colonization hinder learning possibilities and scientific advancement. The paper emphasizes shared responsibility for dismantling oppressive structures, including the “grit” discourse identified in the original paper. It aims to facilitate individual reflection and encourage collective action, fostering positive change within physics spaces.

Science EducationVol. 110(1)
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Instituto Federal da Bahia (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Race, History, and American Society
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.