Price Limit Relaxation and <scp>IPO</scp> Underpricing in Korea

Abstract On June 26, 2023, Korea widened the allowable range of first‐day returns for initial public offerings (IPOs) from a band of −37% to +160% to a band of −40% to +300% relative to the offer price. This study examines the impact of this regulatory change on IPO underpricing. While traditional finance theory predicts that relaxing price limits enhances price discovery, our empirical analysis finds no statistically significant effect of the reform on IPO underpricing. Although average initial returns increased modestly after the regulatory change, these differences are not statistically significant across various sample periods and model specifications. These findings suggest that the dynamics of IPO underpricing are unlikely to be driven solely by regulatory constraints. Instead, the persistently high levels of underpricing and oversubscription point to the potential importance of institutional features, such as conservative offer pricing and underwriters' reputational incentives, in shaping IPO underpricing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.70019
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Price Limit Relaxation and IPO Underpricing in Korea

Geesun Lee
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Price Limit Relaxation and IPO Underpricing in Korea

Geesun Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract On June 26, 2023, Korea widened the allowable range of first‐day returns for initial public offerings (IPOs) from a band of −37% to +160% to a band of −40% to +300% relative to the offer price. This study examines the impact of this regulatory change on IPO underpricing. While traditional finance theory predicts that relaxing price limits enhances price discovery, our empirical analysis finds no statistically significant effect of the reform on IPO underpricing. Although average initial returns increased modestly after the regulatory change, these differences are not statistically significant across various sample periods and model specifications. These findings suggest that the dynamics of IPO underpricing are unlikely to be driven solely by regulatory constraints. Instead, the persistently high levels of underpricing and oversubscription point to the potential importance of institutional features, such as conservative offer pricing and underwriters' reputational incentives, in shaping IPO underpricing.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 55(1)
Korea University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.