Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0: Freedom or Insecurity for Business?

Purpose –This study investigates the dual influence of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 on business development, with a particular focus on their implications for economic security. It explores how the transition from a purely technology-driven paradigm to a more human-centric one affects business models, innovation strategies, and organizational resilience. Design/methodology/approach –The article employs a conceptual literature review methodology. It synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed journals, policy papers, and international institutional reports obtained from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The selection criteria included thematic relevance to digitalization, cyber-physical systems, human-technology interaction, organizational transformation, and strategic foresight. Findings – The study reveals that Industry 4.0 primarily fosters efficiency through automation, data exchange, and smart systems integration. However, it also raises concerns over cyber vulnerabilities and labor market disruptions. Conversely, Industry 5.0 incorporates human creativity and ethical innovation into digital transformation processes, aiming to balance productivity with inclusiveness and adaptability. Nonetheless, both paradigms introduce complex risks, including cybersecurity threats, social inequality in technology access, and institutional inertia. The findings indicate the urgent need for strategic frameworks that mitigate these risks while fostering technological competitiveness. Originality – This research is among the first to conceptually contrast Industry 4.0 and 5.0 from the perspective of economic security. It introduces the concept of Quantum 2.0 as a holistic strategic framework for securing business development through cyber-resilience, institutional adaptation, and human-technology co-evolution. The article contributes to the discourse by linking technological progress with socio-economic resilience, offering insights for policymakers and business strategists seeking sustainable and secure industrial transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tér - Gazdaság - Ember/Journal of Region Economy and Society
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14513/tge-jres.00441
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0: Freedom or Insecurity for Business?

Yevheniia Voroniuk, Iryna Otenko, Oleh Haiduk
Tér - Gazdaság - Ember/Journal of Region Economy and Society
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0: Freedom or Insecurity for Business?

Yevheniia Voroniuk, Iryna Otenko, Oleh Haiduk
article en

Abstract

Purpose –This study investigates the dual influence of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 on business development, with a particular focus on their implications for economic security. It explores how the transition from a purely technology-driven paradigm to a more human-centric one affects business models, innovation strategies, and organizational resilience. Design/methodology/approach –The article employs a conceptual literature review methodology. It synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed journals, policy papers, and international institutional reports obtained from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The selection criteria included thematic relevance to digitalization, cyber-physical systems, human-technology interaction, organizational transformation, and strategic foresight. Findings – The study reveals that Industry 4.0 primarily fosters efficiency through automation, data exchange, and smart systems integration. However, it also raises concerns over cyber vulnerabilities and labor market disruptions. Conversely, Industry 5.0 incorporates human creativity and ethical innovation into digital transformation processes, aiming to balance productivity with inclusiveness and adaptability. Nonetheless, both paradigms introduce complex risks, including cybersecurity threats, social inequality in technology access, and institutional inertia. The findings indicate the urgent need for strategic frameworks that mitigate these risks while fostering technological competitiveness. Originality – This research is among the first to conceptually contrast Industry 4.0 and 5.0 from the perspective of economic security. It introduces the concept of Quantum 2.0 as a holistic strategic framework for securing business development through cyber-resilience, institutional adaptation, and human-technology co-evolution. The article contributes to the discourse by linking technological progress with socio-economic resilience, offering insights for policymakers and business strategists seeking sustainable and secure industrial transformation.

Tér - Gazdaság - Ember/Journal of Region Economy and Society
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.