Carbon Benefits and Water Costs of Cover Crops by Assimilating Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images in a Crop Model

The use of cover crops is one of the most effective practices for maintaining, or even improving, the carbon balance of agricultural soils, while offering various ecosystem benefits. However, replacing bare soil with cover crops can increase transpiration and potentially reduce the water available for subsequent cash crops. The study takes place in southwestern France where it is essential to strike a balance between carbon storage and water availability, and where agroecological practices are encouraged and water resources are limited and expected to diminish with climate change. In this study, estimates of cover crop biomass production, as well as of the components of the water and carbon cycles, are carried out using a hybrid approach, AgriCarbon-EO, combining modeling, remote sensing, and assimilation, with quantification of target variables and their uncertainties at decametric resolution. The SAFYE-CO2 agrometeorological model used in AgriCarbon-EO is calibrated to represent cover crops development, and simulated variables are compared with CO2 fluxes and evapotranspiration measured by eddy covariance (for NEE, R2 = 0.57, RMSE = 0.97 gC·m−2; for ETR, R2 = 0.42, RMSE = 0.87 mm), as well as to an extensive above-ground biomass dataset (R2 = 0.71, RMSE = 93.3 g·m−2). Knowing the local performance of the approach, a large-scale, decametric-resolution modeling exercise was carried out to simulate winter cover crops in southwestern France, over five contrasting fallow periods. The significant variability in cover crop phenology and above-ground biomass was characterized, and estimates of the amount of humified carbon added to the soil by cover crops were quantified at the pixel level. With amounts ranging from 40 to 130 gC·m−2 for most of the considered pixels, these new SOC values show clear trends as a function of cumulative evapotranspiration. However, the impact of cover crops on soil water content appears to be minimal due to spring precipitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17193290
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Benefits and Water Costs of Cover Crops by Assimilating Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images in a Crop Model

Rémy Fieuzal, Taeken Wijmer, Tiphaine Tallec, Ahmad Al Bitar et al.
2 citations
Remote Sensing
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
article

Carbon Benefits and Water Costs of Cover Crops by Assimilating Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images in a Crop Model

Rémy Fieuzal, Taeken Wijmer, Tiphaine Tallec, Ahmad Al Bitar, Éric Ceschia, Jean-François Dejoux
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The use of cover crops is one of the most effective practices for maintaining, or even improving, the carbon balance of agricultural soils, while offering various ecosystem benefits. However, replacing bare soil with cover crops can increase transpiration and potentially reduce the water available for subsequent cash crops. The study takes place in southwestern France where it is essential to strike a balance between carbon storage and water availability, and where agroecological practices are encouraged and water resources are limited and expected to diminish with climate change. In this study, estimates of cover crop biomass production, as well as of the components of the water and carbon cycles, are carried out using a hybrid approach, AgriCarbon-EO, combining modeling, remote sensing, and assimilation, with quantification of target variables and their uncertainties at decametric resolution. The SAFYE-CO2 agrometeorological model used in AgriCarbon-EO is calibrated to represent cover crops development, and simulated variables are compared with CO2 fluxes and evapotranspiration measured by eddy covariance (for NEE, R2 = 0.57, RMSE = 0.97 gC·m−2; for ETR, R2 = 0.42, RMSE = 0.87 mm), as well as to an extensive above-ground biomass dataset (R2 = 0.71, RMSE = 93.3 g·m−2). Knowing the local performance of the approach, a large-scale, decametric-resolution modeling exercise was carried out to simulate winter cover crops in southwestern France, over five contrasting fallow periods. The significant variability in cover crop phenology and above-ground biomass was characterized, and estimates of the amount of humified carbon added to the soil by cover crops were quantified at the pixel level. With amounts ranging from 40 to 130 gC·m−2 for most of the considered pixels, these new SOC values show clear trends as a function of cumulative evapotranspiration. However, the impact of cover crops on soil water content appears to be minimal due to spring precipitation.

Remote SensingVol. 17(19)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Centre d'Études Spatiales de la Biosphère (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Norsk Institutt for Vannforskning, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Institut national des sciences de l'Univers
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.