A literature survey of shapelet quality measures for time series classification

With the rapid development of the Internet of Things, time series classification (TSC) has gained significant attention from researchers due to its applications in various real-world fields, including electroencephalogram/electrocardiogram classification, emotion recognition, and error message detection. To improve classification performance, numerous TSC methods have been proposed in recent years. Among these, shapelet-based TSC methods are particularly notable for their intuitive interpretability. A critical task within these methods is evaluating the quality of candidate shapelets. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art measures for assessing shapelet quality. To present a structured overview, we begin by proposing a taxonomy of these measures, followed by a detailed description of each one. We then discuss these measures, highlighting the challenges faced by current research and offering suggestions for future directions. Finally, we summarize the findings of this survey. We hope that this work will serve as a valuable resource for researchers in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3115
Primary Topic
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A literature survey of shapelet quality measures for time series classification

Xiaodong Guo, Cun Ji, Teng Li
PeerJ Computer Science
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
article

A literature survey of shapelet quality measures for time series classification

Xiaodong Guo, Cun Ji, Teng Li
article en

Abstract

With the rapid development of the Internet of Things, time series classification (TSC) has gained significant attention from researchers due to its applications in various real-world fields, including electroencephalogram/electrocardiogram classification, emotion recognition, and error message detection. To improve classification performance, numerous TSC methods have been proposed in recent years. Among these, shapelet-based TSC methods are particularly notable for their intuitive interpretability. A critical task within these methods is evaluating the quality of candidate shapelets. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art measures for assessing shapelet quality. To present a structured overview, we begin by proposing a taxonomy of these measures, followed by a detailed description of each one. We then discuss these measures, highlighting the challenges faced by current research and offering suggestions for future directions. Finally, we summarize the findings of this survey. We hope that this work will serve as a valuable resource for researchers in the field.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 11
Shandong University (CN), Shandong Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.